McGinnies' (1949) study on perceptual defense was replicated. No significant results were noted for galvanic skin responses. Threshold differences were significant; taboo words had higher thresholds than neutral words. Possibly “emotionality” and “threat” may require separate operational definitions if the effect, “perceptual defense,” is to be clearly demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BootzinR. R.StephensM. W.Individual differences and perceptual defense in the absence of response bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 408–412.
2.
ErdelyiM. H.A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 1974, 8, 1–25.
3.
EricsonC. W.Perceptual defense as a function of unacceptable needs. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 46, 557–564.
4.
McGinniesE.Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychological Review, 1949, 56, 244–251.
5.
McGinniesE.AdornettoJ.Perceptual defense in normal and schizophrenic observers. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 833–837.
6.
WagstaffG. F.The effects of depression—sensitization on a brightness scaling measure of perceptual defense. Journal of Psychology, 1974, 3, 395–401.
7.
WeinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
8.
WeintraubD. J.KrantzD. H.Non-differential rates of dark adaptation to ‘taboo’ and ‘neutral’ stimuli. Psychological Record, 1968, 18, 63–69.
9.
WilliamsL. J.EvansJ. R.Evidence for perceptual defense using a lexical decision task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 50, 195–198.
10.
WorthingtonA. G.Paired comparison scaling of brightness judgement: A method for the measurement of perceptual defense. British Journal of Psychology, 1969, 60, 363–368.
11.
YorkM. W.MandourT.JexS.Perceptual defense—a replication. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, PA, 1983, April.
