17 academically normal and 17 reading disabled children were matched on Full Scale IQ and compared on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery—Children's Revision. The academically normal group performed significantly better on the Expressive Language, Writing, Reading, and Rhythm subscales, which suggests that the Luria-Nebraska may be sensitive to deficits not reflected in Full Scale IQ. Results are consistent with previous research and support the validity of the Luria-Nebraska, although simplistic interpretation of the battery's subscales should be avoided.
CrossenB., & WarrenR. L.Use of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery is aphasia: A conceptual critique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982, 50, 22–31.
3.
GoldenC. J.The Luria-Nebraska Children's Battery: Theory and formulation. In HyndG. W. & OrbrzutJ. E. (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment and the school-age chili: Issues and procedures. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1981. Pp. 277–302.
4.
NolanD. R.HammmkeT. A., & BarkleyR. A.A comparison of the patterns of the neuropsychological performance in two groups of learning disabled children. Journal of Clinical Chili Psychology, 1983, 12, 22–27.
5.
PlaistedJ. R.GustavsonJ. L.WilkeningG. N., & GoldenC. J.The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery—Children's Revision: Theory and current research findings. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1983, 12, 13–21.
6.
ReitanR. M., & DavisonL. A.Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications. New York: Washington, DC: Winston, 1974.
7.
SelzM., & ReitanR. M.Rules for neuropsychological test performance of normal, learning disabled, and brain-injured older children. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1979, 167, 298–302.
