Judged distance in a large open field, scaled by the method of magnitude estimation, is related to physical distance by a power function with an exponent smaller than unity. The exponents obtained with two ranges of distance were not affected by the availability of a standard. The mean exponent for all 80 individual power functions was 0.86, with a standard deviation of 0.11.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdJ. C.Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon, 1970.
2.
BjörkmanM.StrangertB.The relationship between ratio estimates and stimulus dispersion. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, University of Stockholm, No. 81, 1960.
3.
DaSilvaJ. A.DosSantosR. A.Scaling apparent distance in a large open field: presence of a standard does not increase the exponent of the power function. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 55, 267–274.
4.
EkmanG.LindmanR.William-OlsonW.A psychophysical study of cartographic symbols. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1961, 13, 355–368.
5.
FraymanB. J.DawsonW. E.The effect of object shape and mode of presentation on judgments of apparent volume. Perception and Psychophysics, 1981, 29, 56–62.
6.
MacMillanN. A.MoschettoC. F.BialostozkyF. M.EngelL.Size judgment: the presence of a standard increases the exponent of the power law. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 16, 340–346.
7.
MashhourM.HosmanJ.On the new “psychophysical law”: a validation study. Perception and Psychophysics, 1961, 3, 367–375.
8.
TeghtsoonianR.Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law. American Journal of Psychology, 1973, 86, 3–27.
