Possible bases for discrepancies in results of studies of object reception (catching a ball) are outlined. Needed research is specified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GriceG. R.Dependence of empirical laws upon the source of experimental variation. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 488–498.
2.
GutteridgeM.A study of motor achievement of young children. Psychological Archives, 1939, 34, 1–178.
3.
HerkowitzJ.Developmental task analysis: the design of movement experiences and evaluation of motor development status. In RidenourM. V. (Ed.), Motor development: issues and applications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, 1978. Pp. 139–164.
4.
IsaacsL.The effects of ball size, ball color and preferred color on the catching ability of young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Wisconsin, 1972.
5.
MeadleyD.A study of the catching ability of children in grades one to four. Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer. of Iowa, 1941.
6.
PayneV. G.Simultaneous investigation of effects of distance of projection and object size on object reception by children in Grade 1. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 54, 1183–1187.
7.
PayneV. G.KoslowR.Effects of varying ball diameters on catching ability of young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 53, 739–744.
