Despite the fact that mentally retarded children have frequently been characterized as being deficient in selective attention, this characteristic has seldom been considered in the development of instructional media for the handicapped. To determine the influence of verbal and written labels on the selective attention to visual materials, retarded children were tested. Under treatment conditions, retarded and normal children located an object more quickly, looked at the object longer, and recognized more of the treatment objects on a recognition memory task. Information regarding the learning characteristics of retarded children may be simply and effectively applied to development of materials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlabisoF.Inhibitory functions of attention on reducing hyperactive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1972, 77, 259–282.
2.
AllenW. H.Intellectual abilities and instructional media design. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 1975, 23, 139–170.
3.
AllenW. H.CooneyS. M., & WeintraubR.Audio implementation of still and motion pictures. USOE Final Report, Project No. 5-0741, Los Angeles, Univer. of Southern California, 1968.
4.
CrosbyK. G., & BlattB.Attention and mental retardation. Journal of Education, 1968, 150, 67–81.
5.
DennyM. R.A theoretical analysis and its application to training the retarded. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 1–27.
6.
DiVestaF.Trait-treatment interactions, cognitive processes and research on communication media. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 1975, 23, 185–196.
7.
DusekJ. B.The effects of labeling and pointing on children's selective attention. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 115–116.
8.
FlemingM. L., & LevieW. H.Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publ., 1978.
9.
FlemingM. L.LevieW. H., & McLeskeyJ. L.Compensating attentional deficits in handicapped learners through special media techniques. USOE/BEH Final Report, Project No. 446AH80038, Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University, 1980.
10.
LobbH.Effects of verbal rehearsal on discrimination learning in moderately retarded and nursery-school children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974, 79, 449–454.
11.
LobbH., & ChildsR.Verbal control and intradimensional transfer of discrimination learning in mentally retarded vs intellectually average subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 182–192.
12.
LobbH., & StogdillD.Low IQ deficit in intradimensional discrimination shift despite overtraining and verbal feedback. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974, 79, 455–461.
13.
MackworthJ. F., & MackworthN. H.Eye fixations recorded on changing visual scenes by the television eye-marker. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1958, 48, 439.
14.
MackworthN. H., & ThomasE. L.Head-mounted eye marker camera. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1962, 82, 713–716.
15.
MercerC. D., & SnellN.Learning theory research in mental retardation: Implications for teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1977.
16.
MilgramN. A., & NoceJ. S.Relevant and irrelevant verbalization in discrimination and reversal learning by normal and retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968, 59, 169–175.
17.
WheelerR., & DusekJ.The effects of attentional and cognitive factors on children's incidental learning. Child Development, 1973, 44, 252–258.
18.
WolfW.Perception of visual displays. Viewpoints, 1971, 47, 112–140.
19.
ZeamanD., & HouseB. J.The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 159–223.
20.
ZeamanD., & HouseB. J.A review of attention theory. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiencies, psychological theory and research. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979 Pp. 63–120.
