Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To assess the influence of individuals' defensive style on perception of pain in others, 60 undergraduate women rated the amount of pain expressed in slides of people displaying high or low pain. Subjects were categorized as high or low on Byrne's Repression-Sensitization Scale, and their level of stress was varied by presentation of an anxiety-provoking film (stress condition) or a neutral film (control condition) prior to the rating task. A significant interaction between Repression-Sensitization and slide category (high versus low pain) indicated that sensitizers assigned higher ratings of pain than repressers to slides that were relatively low in rated expressiveness of pain. Individual differences in readiness to recognize potentially threatening stimuli seem most evident when the stimuli are relatively ambiguous. The manipulation of stress produced no significant effects on ratings of pain.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

R. D.

On confounding of the Repression-Sensitization and Manifest Anxiety Scales. Psychological Reports, 1972, 30, 392–394.

Bell

P. A.

Byrne

Repression-sensitization. In London

Exner

(Eds.), Dimensions of personality. Toronto: Wiley, 1978. Pp. 449–485.

Byrne

The Repression-Sensitization Scale: rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality, 1961, 29, 334–349.

Byrne

Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In Maher

B. A.

(Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1964. Pp. 170–220.

Byrne

Barry

Nelson

Relation of the revised Repression-Sensitization Scale to measures of self-description. Psychological Reports, 1963, 13, 323–334.

Carlson

R. W.

Dimensionality of the Repression-Sensitization Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1979, 35, 78–84.

Carroll

Repression-sensitization and the verbal elaboration of experience. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 38, 147.

Eriksen

C. W.

The case for perceptual defense. Psychological Review, 1954, 61, 175–182.

Golin

Herron

E. W.

Lakota

Reineck

L. A.

A factor analytic study of the Manifest Anxiety, Extraversion, and Repression-Sensitization Scales. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967, 31, 564–569.

10.

Highland

A. C.

Confounding of the Repression-Sensitization Scale, controlled for social desirability, with the IPAT Anxiety Scale. Psychological Reports, 1980, 47, 1003–1006.

11.

Lazarus

R. S.

Positive denial: the case for not facing reality. Psychology Today, 1979, 13(6), 44–60.

12.

Lomont

J. F.

The repression-sensitization dimension in relation to anxiety responses. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 84–86.

13.

Merbaum

Badia

Tolerance of repressers and sensitizers to noxious stimulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967, 72, 349–353.

14.

Murstein

B. I.

Theory and research in projective techniques emphasizing the TAT. New York: Wiley, 1963.

15.

Vaughan

K. B.

Lanzetta

J. T.

Vicarious instigation and conditioning of facial expressive and autonomic responses to a model's display of pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 909–923.

16.

Weinberger

D. A.

Schwartz

G. E.

Davidson

R. J.

Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1979, 88, 369–380.

17.

White

M. D.

Wilkins

Bogus physiological feedback and response thresholds of repressers and sensitizers. Journal of Research in Personality, 1973, 7, 78–87.

18.

Winer

B. J.

Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

19.

Yabuki

Cognition and defense on the dimension of repression-sensitization. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 1971, 42, 266–275.

Repression-Sensitization,Stress,and Perception of Pain in Others

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References