By means of the method of fractionation, scales for subjective distance were derived from five different types of judgment accomplished with two ranges of distance estimated in a large open field. It was found (a) that the scales for subjective distance are to a considerable extent influenced by ways of obtaining the judgments, (b) that the scales are relatively uninfluenced by range of distance, (c) that the exponents of the scales for egocentric distances are different from those for exocentric distances, (d) that the functions for egocentric distances are slightly decelerated but for exocentric distances slightly accelerated, and (e) that the average exponent for all subjects was 0.98.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdJ. C.Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon, 1970.
2.
CookM. The judgment of distance on a plane surface. Perception and Psychophysics, 1978, 23, 85–90.
3.
GalanterE.GalanterP.Range estimates of distant visual stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 301–306.
4.
GibsonE. J.BergmanR.The effect of training on absolute estimation of distance over the ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48, 473–482.
5.
GibsonE. J.BergmanR.PurdyJ.Effect of prior training with a scale of distance on absolute and relative judgments of distance over ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 97–105.
6.
GilinskyA. S.Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 1951, 58, 460–482.
7.
GogelW. C.Visual perception on spatial extent. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1964, 54, 411–416.
8.
GogelW. C.The metric in visual space. In EpsteinW. (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley, 1977. Pp. 129–181.
9.
GruberH. E.The relation of perceived size to perceived distance. American Journal of Psychology, 1954, 67, 411–426.
10.
HagenM. A.TeghtsoonianM.The effects of binocular and motion-generated information on the perception of depth and height. Perception and Psychophysics, 1981, 30, 257–265.
11.
KünnapasT. M.Scales for subjective distance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960, 1, 187–192.
12.
KurodaT.Distance constancy: functional relationships between apparent distance and physical distance. Psychologische Forschung, 1971, 34, 199–219.
13.
PurdyJ.GibsonE. J.Distance judgment by the method of fractionation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 374–380.
14.
RogersS. P.GogelW. C.The relation between a judged and physical distance in multicue conditions as a function of instructions and tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 41, 171–178.
15.
StevensS. S.On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 153–181.
