Apparent distance in a large open field was scaled by the method of magnitude estimation with or without a standard distance present. The presence of the standard did not increase the exponent of the power law. The average exponent of the power function relating judged to physical distance was .87. The results are consistent with those of other studies showing that apparent distance is a decelerating function of actual distance in a natural outdoor setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdJ. C.Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon, 1970.
2.
BjörkmanM.StrangertB.The relationship between ratio estimates and stimulus dispersion. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, University of Stockholm, No. 81, 1960.
3.
CarlsonV. R.Instructions and perceptual constancy judgments. In EpsteinW. (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley, 1977. Pp. 217–254.
4.
CollinsJ. R.Distance perception as a function of age. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1976, 28, 109–113.
5.
CookM.The judgment of distance on a plane surface. Perception and Psychophysics, 1978, 23, 85–90.
6.
DaSilvaJ. A.RozestratenR. J. A.Avaliaçao de ângulos iguais e ângulos subjetivamente equivalentes em campo aberto. Psicologia, 1977, 2, 5–12. (a).
7.
DaSilvaJ. A.RozestratenR. J. A.Fracionamento de distâncias no laboratório e no campo aberto. Psicologia, 1977, 3, 77–92. (b).
8.
DaSilvaJ. A.RozestratenR. J. A.Construçao de uma escala subjetiva de distância pelo método de fracionamento. Psicologia, 1979, 5, 45–58.
9.
EkmanG.LindmanR.William-OlsonW.A psychophysical study of cartographic symbols. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1961, 13, 355–368.
10.
EpsteinW.Varieties of perceptual learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
11.
EpsteinW.ParkJ.CaseyA.The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 1961, 58, 491–514.
12.
FerrisS. H.Motion parallax and absolute distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 95, 258–263.
13.
GalanterE.GalanterP.Range estimates of distant visual stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 301–306.
14.
GibsonE. J.BergmanR.The effect of training on absolute estimation of distance over the ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48, 473–482.
15.
GibsonE. J.BergmanR.PurdyJ.The effect of prior training with a scale of distance on absolute and relative judgments of distance over the ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 97–105.
16.
GilinskyA. S.Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 1951, 58, 460–482.
GogelW. C.The metric of visual space. In EpsteinW. (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley, 1977. Pp. 129–181.
19.
HagenM. A.TeghtsoonianM.The effects of binocular and motion-generated information on the perception of depth and height. Perception and Psychophysics, 1981, 30, 257–265.
20.
HarwayN. I.Judgment of distance in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 385–390.
21.
KünnapasT. M.Scales for subjective distance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960, 1, 187–192.
22.
KünnapasT. M.Distance perception as a function of available visual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 523–529.
23.
MacMillanN. A.MoschettoC. F.BialostozkyF. M.EngelL.Size judgment: the presence of a standard increases the exponent of the power law. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 16, 340–346.
24.
MashhourM.HosmanJ.On the new “psychophysical law:” a validation study. Perception and Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 367–375.
25.
MillerA. L.PedersenV. M.SheldonR. W.Magnitude estimation of average length: a follow-up. American Journal of Psychology, 1970, 82, 95–102.
26.
ParkJ. N.MichaelsonG. J.Distance judgments under different size-information conditions. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 15, 57–60.
27.
PoultonE. C.The new psychophysics: six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 1–19.
28.
PurdyJ.GibsonE. J.Distance judgment by the method of fractionation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 374–380.
29.
RogersS. P.GogelW. G.The relation between a judged and physical distance in multicue conditions as a function of instructions and tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 41, 171–178.
30.
StevensJ. G.TulvingE.Estimations of loudness by a group of untrained observers. American Journal of Psychology, 1957, 70, 600–605.
31.
StevensS. S.The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes: loudness. American Journal of Psychology, 1956, 69, 1–25.
32.
TeghtsoonianM.BeckwithJ. B.Children's size judgments when size and distance vary: is there a developmental trend to overconstancy?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976, 22, 23–39.
TeghtsoonianR.Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law. American Journal of Psychology, 1973, 86, 3–27.
35.
TeghtsoonianR.TeghtsoonianM.The effects of size and distance on magnitude estimations of apparent size. American Journal of Psychology, 1970, 83, 601–612. (a).
