Responses to various fixed test-response formats were examined for “reliability” due to systematic error; Cronbach's as up to .67 were obtained. Of the various formats tested, 4-point Likert were the least affected while various forms of lines and faces were most problematic. Results are discussed in relation to possible modification in a to account for systematic bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardoJ. W.HugheyJ. B.A Monte Carlo simulation of the effects of central tendency error on the magnitude of Cronbach's alpha. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 46, 303–310.
2.
BardoJ. W.HugheyJ. B.Validity of Bardo and Hughey's Monte Carlo simulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 47, 622.
3.
BardoJ. W.YeagerS. J.KlingspornM. J.A preliminary assessment of format-specific central tendency and leniency error in summated rating scales. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 54, 227–234.
4.
LordF. M.NovickM. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
5.
NunnallyJ.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
