A systematic replication employed 14 naive subjects in the semantic rating of 50 affective words. Mean ratings from two groups correlated very strongly, e.g., .95, .93, with those previously produced by experienced subjects, and factor analyses of naive ratings validated the importance (80% of total variance) of Pleasure and Arousal as dimensions of affect. A third “ghost” (9% of total variance) factor was shown to be less predictive as well as less stable
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RussellJ. A.Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 1152–1168.
2.
WhissbllC. M.Pleasure and activation revisited: the dimensions underlying semantic responses to 50 randomly selected “emotional” words. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 53, 871–874.
