Piaget's norms for animistic thought have been criticized as too high. These critics have in turn been questioned for failing to obtain justifications for judgments. This study attempted to reconcile the differences between the two camps through a standardized questioning format which went a step beyond justification. Subjects, aged 3 to 6 yr., were given a task in which they judged the life qualities of a stimulus, justified their judgment, and judged again after being given an anomalous probe. Analysis indicated that younger children were unable to adhere to an original judgment when probed while older children were.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BruceM.Animism vs. evolution of the concept “alive.”Journal of Psychology, 1941, 12, 81–90.
2.
DennisW.Animism and related tendencies in Hopi children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943, 38, 21–36.
DeutscheJ. M.The development of children's concepts of causal relations. Minneapolis: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1937.
5.
HavighurstR. J., & NeugartenB. L.Belief in immanent justice and animism. In HavighurstR. J. (Ed.), American Indian and white children: A socio-psycho-logical investigation. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1955. Chapter 6.
6.
HuangI., & LeeW. H.Experimental analysis of child animism. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1945, 66, 69–74.
7.
JahodaG.Child animism: II. A study in West Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 1958, 47, 213–222.
8.
JohnsonE. C., & JoseyC. C.A note on the developmental forms of children as described by Piaget. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1931–1932, 26, 338–339.
9.
JonesF. N., & ArringtonM. G.The explanation of physical phenomena given by white and Negro children. Comparative Psychological Monographs, 1945, 18, No. 5.
10.
KlingbergG.The distinction between living and non-living among 7- to 10- year-old children, with some remarks concerning the animism controversy. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1957, 90, 227–238.
11.
LaurendeauM., & PinardA.Causal thinking in the child. New York: International Universities Press, 1962.
12.
LooftW. R.Animistic thought in children: Effects of two response modes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 59–62.
13.
MeadM.An investigation of the thought of primitive children with special reference to animism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1932, 62, 173–190.
14.
PiagetJ.The child's conception of the world. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1929.
15.
RussellR. W., & DennisW.Studies in animism: I. A standardized procedure for the investigation of animism. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1939, 55, 389–400.
16.
WernerH., & CarrisonD.Animistic thinking in brain-injured, mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1944, 39, 43–62.
17.
WilliamsonP. A.The effects of methodology and level of development on children's animistic thought. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1981, 138, 159–174.
