The normalized mean is developed and discussed as a descriptive measure of central location. The advantages of the normalized mean over the arithmetic mean, median, and trimmed mean are discussed.
DuncanO. D.The measurement of population distribution. Population Studies, 1957, 11, 27–45.
3.
GibbonsJ. D.StavigG. R.Quantitative coefficients for selecting a measure of centra] location. In SchuesslerK. F. (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1980. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1979. Pp. 545–558.
4.
HarterH. L.Order statistics and their use in testing and estimation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970.
5.
HoggR.Adaptive robust procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974, 69, 909–923.
6.
MostellerF.TukeyJ.Data analysis and regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
7.
NorrisN.Inequalities among averages. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1935, 6, 27–29.
8.
NorrisN.General means and statistical theory. American Statistician, 1976, 30(1), 8–12.
StavigG. R.The median controversy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 47, 1175–1178.
11.
StavigG. R.GibbonsJ. D.Comparing the mean and median as measures of centrality. International Statistical Review, 1977, 45, 63–70.
12.
TukeyJ. W.A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In OlkinI.GhuryeS. G.HoeffdingW.MadowW. D.MannH. R. (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univer. Press, 1960. Pp. 448–485.
