Data for 4-, 5-, and 7-position Likert formats from 292 undergraduates showed systematic error varied among formats, i.e., central tendency errors tended to increase with increasing numbers of categories and to reduce variances expected.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardoJ. W.SteiberS. R.BardoD. J.A note on the empirical assessment of attitudes. Free Inquiry, 1980, 8, 173–177.
2.
CooperM.An exact probability test for use with the Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976, 36, 647–655.
3.
GuilfordJ. P.Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
4.
HaysW. L.Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1981.
5.
KimJ. O.Multivariate analysis of ordinal variables. American Journal of Sociology, 1975, 81, 261–298.
6.
LabovitzS.The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 515–524.
7.
LikertR.A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 1932, Monograph No. 140.
8.
NewcombT.An experiment designed to test the validity of a rating technique. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1931, 22, 279–289.
9.
RuggH. O.Is the rating of human character practicable?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1921, 13, 30–42.
10.
StockfordL.BissellH. S.Factors involved in establishing a merit rating scale. Personnel, 1949, 26, 94–118.
11.
ThorndikeE. L.A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1920, 4, 25–29.
