Abstract
Humor ratings by 80 college students were obtained on non-captioned cartoons for comparison to whole-captioned cartoons and to independent ratings of the pictures and captions of the whole-captioned cartoons. Whole-captioned cartoons were rated significantly funnier than the independent ratings of pictures or captions. The non-captioned cartoons were not rated significantly different from pictures, captions, or whole-captioned cartoons. A significant interaction was found between the three forms of captioned cartoons and whether the cartoons were pictorial or caption-dependent. Subjects rated strictly pictorial non-captioned cartoons significantly funnier than non-captioned cartoons with writing in the pictures. These results support some previous findings and suggest control for cartoons' structure in studies of humor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
