Using magnitude estimation, subjects made judgments of the seriousness of criminal offenses. These subjective judgments were affected by the information the subject was given concerning the maximum allowable prison sentences for the crimes. The influence of penalty information was evident for a variety of offenses at different levels of subjective seriousness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CoombsC. H.Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 85–91.
2.
EkmanG.Measurement of moral judgment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 3–9.
3.
SellinT., & WolfgangM. E.The measurement of delinquency. New Jersey: Patterson Smith, 1978.
4.
StevensS. S.A metric for the social consensus. Science, 1966, 151, 530–541.
5.
StevensS. S.Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1975.
6.
ThurstoneL. L.The method of paired comparisons for social values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1927, 21, 384–400.
