Abstract
The MMPI was analyzed by readability formulas which represent varying criterion of comprehension from 50 to 90%. Computation involved a computer-generated word and syllable count, taking as many non-reoccurring samples as possible. If an examiner wishes to ensure 90% comprehension of the inventory items, nine successful years of schooling seem necessary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dahlstrom
W. G.
Welsh
G. S.
Dahlstrom
L. E.
An MMPI handbook. Vol. 1 . Clinical interpretations . Minneapolis : Univer. of Minnesota Press , 1972 .
2.
Forbes
F. W.
Cottle
W. C.
A new method for determining readability of standardized tests . Journal of Applied Psychology , 1953 , 37 , 185 –190 .
3.
Fry
E.
A readability formula that saves time . Journal of Reading , 1968 , 11 , 513 –517 , 575 –578 .
4.
Hanes
B.
Reading ease and MMPI results . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 1953 , 9 , 83 –85 .
5.
Harris
A.
Sipay
E.
How to increase reading ability . (6th ed. ) New York : Longman , 1975 .
6.
Hathaway
S. R.
McKinley
J. C.
Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory . New York : Psychological Corp. , 1943 , 1970 .
7.
Klare
G. R.
The measurement of readability . Ames, IA : Iowa State Univer. Press , 1963 .
8.
McLaughlin
G. H.
SMOG-grading . Journal of Reading , 1969 , 12 , 639 –646 .
9.
Powers
R. D.
Sumner
W. A.
Kearl
B. E.
A recalculation of four readability formulas . Journal of Educational Psychology , 1958 , 49 , 99 –105 .
10.
Taylor
J. F.
Graham
J. R.
A simplified MMPI form with reduced reading difficulty level . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 1974 , 30 , 182 –185 .