The relationship of two-flash and absolute auditory threshold measures was studied in a sample of 65 male college students. The two-flash threshold showed sensitivity essentially unrelated to absolute auditory sensitivity (r = .03). This result was contrasted with that reported by Hanback and Revelle who found a weak but significantly positive correlation for the sensitivity values for the two tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewR. J.Arousal and the causation of behavior. Behaviour, 1974, 51, 135–167.
2.
BoissonneaultD. R.DoroshM. E., & TongJ. E.The effect of induced heart rate change and neuroticism on the resolution of temporally paired flashes. Psychophysiology, 1971, 7, 465–474.
3.
ClaridgeG. S., & ChappaH. J.Psychoticism: A study of its biological basis in normal subjects. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 12, 175–187.
4.
ClarkW. C.The psyche in psychophysics: A sensory-decision theory analysis of the effect of instructions on flicker sensitivity and response bias. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 358–366.
5.
DoroshM. E.TongJ. E., & BoissonneaultD. R.White noise, instructions, and two-flash fusion with two signal-detection procedures. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 20, 98–99.
6.
DuffyE.Activation. In GreenfieldN. S. & SternbachR. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Holt, 1972. Pp. 577–622.
7.
GruzelierJ. H., & CorballisM. C.Effects of instructions and drug administration on temporal resolution of paired flashes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 22, 115–124.
8.
HanbackJ. W., & RevelleW.Arousal and perceptual sensitivity in hypochondriacs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978, 87, 523–530.
9.
HumeW. I., & ClaridgeG. S.A comparison of two measures of ‘arousal’ in normal subjects. Life Sciences, 1965, 4, 545–553.
10.
IppolitovF. V.Interanalyser differences in the sensitivity-strength parameter for vision, hearing and cutaneous modalities. In NebylitsynV. D. & GrayJ. A. (Eds.), Biological bases of individual behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 43–61.
11.
JonesO.Relationship between visual and auditory discrimination and anxiety level. Journal of General Psychology, 1958, 59, 111–118.
12.
KingH. E.Two-flash and flicker fusion thresholds for normal and schizophrenic subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 14, 517–518.
13.
KishG. B.FrankelA.MastersJ. J., & BerryR. A.Augmenting-reducing and sensation seeking: A test of Sales' hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976, 32, 302–305.
14.
LaceyB. C., & LaceyJ. I.Studies of heart rate and other bodily processes in sensorimotor behavior. In ObristP. A.BlackA. H.BrenerJ., & Di CaraL. V. (Eds.), Cardiovascular psychophysiology: Current issues in response mechanisms, biofeedback and methodology. Chicago: Aldine, 1974. Pp. 538–564.
15.
LaceyJ. I.Somatic response patterning and stress: Some revisions of activation theory. In AppleyM. H. & TrumbullR. (Eds.), Psychological stress. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967. Pp. 14–42.
16.
LindsleyD. B., & LansingR. W.Flicker and two-flash fusional thresholds and the EEG. American Psychologist, 1956, 11, 433.
17.
LykkenD. T., & MaleyM.Autonomic versus cortical arousal in schizophrenics and non-psychotics. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1968, 6, 21–32.
18.
LykkenD. T.RoseR.LutherB., & MaleyM.Correcting psychophysiological measures for individual differences in range. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 481–484.
NebylitsynV. D.Fundamental properties of the human nervous system. New York: Plenum, 1972. Pp. 173–188.
21.
NebylitsynV. D.RozhdestvenskayaV. I., & TeplovB. M.Concerning the interrelation between absolute sensitivity and strength of the nervous system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 12, 17–25.
22.
PearsonL. A., & TongJ. E.Two-flash fusion threshold: The influence of age, psychophysical method, instructions, viewing conditions, sex and subject variability. British Journal of Psychology, 1968, 59, 407–414.
23.
RobinsonT. N.Jr., & ZahnT. P.Covariation of two-flash threshold and autonomic arousal for high and low scorers on a measure of psychoticism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 18, 431–441.
24.
RobinsonT. N.Jr., & ZahnT. P.Auditory sensitivity, personality and ANS arousability. Psychophysiology, 1980, 17, 285–286.
25.
RoseR. J.Anxiety and arousal: A study of two-flash fusion and skin conductance. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 6, 81–82.
26.
RusalovV. M.Absolute sensitivity of the analysers and somatotype in man. In NebylitsynV. D. & GrayJ. A. (Eds.), Biological bases of individual behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 128–140.
27.
SalesS. M., & ThroopW. F.Relationship between kinesthetic aftereffects and “strength of the nervous system.”Psychophysiology, 1972, 9, 492–497.
28.
SmithS. L.Extraversion and sensory threshold. Psychophysiology, 1968, 5, 293–299.
29.
TreismanM., & WattsT. R.Relations between signal detectability theory and the traditional procedures for measuring sensory thresholds: Estimating d′ from results given by the method of constant stimuli. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 438–454.
30.
VenablesP. H.A comparison of two flash and two click thresholds in schizophrenic and normal subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 19, 371–373. (a)
31.
VenablesP. H.The relation of two-flash and two-click thresholds to withdrawal in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenics. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1967, 6, 60–62. (b)
