Theoretical and empirical studies in motor abilities were synthesized to construct an extensive range of tests items with auxiliary apparatus. These items were administered to 765 children between ages 4 1/2 and 14 1/2 yr. Results indicate that motor proficiency can be assessed safely and reliably in one testing period. The factor analysis of the 46 items supported the original subtest grouping of the items which employed a theoretical-rational strategy. Factor analysis of the subtests suggested the existence of two major dimensions, speed-precision-strength and balance-coordination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BruininksR. H.The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1978.
2.
CrattyB. J.Movement behavior and motor learning. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1967.
3.
CrattyB. J.Perceptual and motor development in infants and young children. New York: Macmillan, 1970.
4.
CrattyB. J.Perceptual and motor development in infants and children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
5.
CumbeeF. Z.MeyerM.PetersonG.Factorial analysis of motor co-ordination variables for third and fourth grade girls. Research Quarterly, 1957, 28, 2, 100–108.
6.
DollE. A. (Ed.) The Oseretsky Tests of Motor Proficiency. (Translation from the Portuguese adaptation) Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1946.
FleishmanE. A.The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
10.
FleishmanE. A.HempelW. E.Factorial analysis of complex psychomotor performance and related skills. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1956, 40, 96–104.
11.
GuilfordJ. P.A system of psychomotor abilities. American Journal of Psychology, 1958, 71, 164–174.
12.
HarrowA. J.Taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: David McKay, 1972.
13.
NieN. H.HullG. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H.Statistical package for the social sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
14.
RarickG. L.Motor development during infancy and childhood. Madison, WI: College Printing & Typing, 1961.
15.
RarickG. L.DobbinsD. A.Basic components in the motor performance of educable mentally retarded children: Implications for curriculum development. (Grant No. OEG-0-70-2568-610). Washington, DC: U. S. Office of Education, 1972.
16.
RaschG.Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960.
17.
WrightB. D.PanchapakesanN.A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969, 1, 23–48.
