Two experiments were conducted to investigate the ability of 12 subjects to discriminate between whispered consonants that are differentiated, in normal speech, on the basis of voicing. In general, the subjects were able to make these discriminations, although certain phonemes (such as /d — t/) were easier to discriminate than others |ð−θ|. Possible acoustic features the subjects might be using to make these discriminations were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdesA. E.How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 16, 61–67.
2.
AinsworthW. A.Mechanisms of selective feature adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1977, 21, 365–370.
3.
AllenJ.HaggardM.Perception of voicing and place features in whispered speech: A dichotic choice analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 1977, 21, 315–322.
4.
BlumsteinS. E.StevensK. N.Acoustic invariance of speech production: Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979, 66, 1001–1017.
5.
BregmanA. S.CampbellJ.Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequence of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89, 244–249.
6.
ColeR. A.CooperW. E.SingerJ.AllardF.Selective adaptation of English consonants using real speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 227–244.
7.
ColeR. A.ScottB.Toward a theory of speech perception. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 348–374.
8.
CooperW. E.Adaptation of phonetic feature analyzers for place of articulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974, 56, 617–628. (a)
9.
CooperW. E.Selective adaptation for acoustic cues of voicing in initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 1974, 2, 303–313. (b)
10.
CooperW. E.EbertR. R.ColeR. A.Perceptual analysis of stop consonants and glides. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976, 2, 92–104. (a)
11.
CooperW. E.EbertR. R.ColeR. A.Speech perception and production of the consonant cluster /st/. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976, 2, 105–114. (b)
12.
CooperW. E.LauritsenM. R.Feature processing in the perception and production of speech. Nature, 1974, 252, 121–123.
13.
DannenbringG. L.Discrimination of whispered phoneme pairs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, June, 1977.
14.
DenesP.Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 761–764.
15.
DiehlR. L.The effect of selective adaptation on the identification of speech sounds. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 17, 48–52.
16.
DiehlR. L.RosenbergD. M.Acoustic feature analysis in the perception of voicing contrasts. Perception and Psychophysics, 1977, 21, 418–422.
17.
EimasP. D.CooperW. E.CorbitJ. D.Some properties of linguistic feature detectors. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 247–252.
18.
EimasP. D.CorbitJ. D.Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 4, 99–109.
19.
FantC. G. M.Auditory patterns in speech. In Wathen-DunnW. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Models of Perception of Speech and Visual Form, 1964. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1967. Pp. 111–125.
20.
HalleM.Phonology in generative grammar. Word, 1962, 18, 54–72.
21.
HalleM.On the bases of phonology. In FodorJ. A.KatzJ. J. (Eds.), The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964. Pp. 324–333.
22.
JakobsonR.FantC. G. M.HalleM.Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1952.
23.
JustM. A.SuslickR. L.MichaelsS.ShockeyL.Acoustic cues and psychological processes in the perception of natural stop consonants. Perception and Psychophysics, 1978, 24, 327–336.
24.
LibermanA. M.CooperF. S.ShankweilerD. P.Studdert-KennedyM.Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 431–461.
25.
LiskerL.In qualified defense of VOT. Language and Speech, 1978, 21, 375–383.
26.
MillerG. A.NicelyP. E.An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 338–352.
27.
MillerJ. L.Properties of feature detectors for speech: Evidence from the effects of selective adaptation on dichotic listening. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 389–397.
28.
NeisserU.Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
29.
ParnellM.AmermanJ. D.WellsG. B.Closure and constriction duration for alveolar consonants during voiced and whispered speaking conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 61, 612–613.
30.
PotterR. K.KoppG. A.GreenH. C.Visible speech. New York: Dover, 1966.
31.
ReppB. H.Relative amplitude of aspiration noise as a voicing cue for syllable-initial stop consonants. Language and Speech, 1979, 22, 173–189.
32.
RudnickyA. I.ColeR. A.Adaptation produced by connected speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977, 3, 51–61.
33.
SearleC. L.JacobsonJ. Z.RaymentS. G.Stop consonant discrimination based on human audition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979, 65, 799–809.
34.
TartterV. C.EimasP. D.The role of auditory feature detectors in the perception of speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 293–298.
35.
WickelgrenW. A.Distinctive features and errors in short-term memory for English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 38, 583–588.
