Three points are advanced in response to criticisms of the re-evaluation of the 1965 study by Hess, et al.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HessE. H.PeirovichS. B.A response to Nicholas F. Skinner's “The Hess, et al. study of pupillary activity in heterosexual and homosexual males: A re-evaluation.”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 51, 845–846.
2.
HessE. H.SeltzerA.SchlienJ. M.Pupil responses of herero- and homo-sexual males to pictures of men and women: A pilot study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 165–168.
3.
JanisseM. P.Pupil size and affect: A critical review of the literature since 1960. Canadian Psychologist, 1973, 14, 311–329.
4.
JanisseM. P.BradleyM. T.DumoffM. G.Discriminating emotion and mental effort with pupil size. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Calgary, 1980. (Abstract)
5.
SkinnerN.Personality correlates of complex human learning. National Library of Canada, Canadian thesis Microfilm No. 8124, 1971.
6.
SkinnerN. F.The Hess, et al. study of pupillary activity in heterosexual and homosexual males: A re-evaluation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 51, 844.
7.
ZuckermanM.Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human brain. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 75, 297–329.
