Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of a counselor's eye contact on the counselor's communication of facultative conditions. 48 undergraduate and graduate majors in education were randomly assigned to one of six types of 10-min. counseling sessions, representing two levels of eye direction (eye-to-eye and eye-to-nose/mouth) and three amounts of eye contact (high, medium, low). Interviews were videotaped. All subjects met with the same counselor. Interrater reliability was .87 for the counselor's maintenance of amount of eye contact and .03 for direction. Two raters independently assessed the counselor's communicated facilitative conditions with high agreement. A two-way analysis of variance with Scheffé's comparisons showed that the communication of respect and genuineness is positively and significantly related to greater eye contact.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carkhuff

R. R.

Helping and human relations. Vol. 2. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.

Delaney

D. J.

Sensitization of nonverbal communication. Counselor Education and Supervision, 1968, 7, 315–316.

Exline

R. V.

Visual interaction: The glance of power and preference. In Cole

J. K.

(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1971. Lincoln, Neb.: Univer. of Nebraska Press, 1972. Pp. 163–206.

Exline

R. V.

Fehr

B. J.

Applications of semiosis to the study of visual interaction. In Siegman

A. W.

Feldstein

(Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Assoc., 1978. Pp. 117–157.

Exline

R. V.

Winters

L. C.

Affective relations and mutual glances in dyads. In Tompkins

S. S.

Izard

C. E.

(Eds.), Affect, cognition and personality. New York: Springer, 1965. Pp. 319–350.

Gladstein

G. A.

Nonverbal communication and counseling/psychotherapy. Counseling Psychologist, 1974, 4, 34–57.

Graves

J. R.

Robinson

J. D.

II . Proxemic behavior as a function of inconsistent verbal and nonverbal messages. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976, 23, 333–338.

Kelly

E. W.

Jr.

Effects of counselor's eye contact on student-clients' perceptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 46, 627–632.

Krumboltz

J. D. F.

Varenhorst

B. B.

Thoresen

C. E.

Nonverbal factors in the effectiveness of models in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1967, 14, 412–418.

10.

Lacross

M. B.

Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor attractiveness and persuasiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975, 22, 563–566.

11.

Schapiro

J. G.

Foster

C. P.

Powell

Facial and bodily cues of genuineness, empathy, and warmth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1968, 24, 233–236.

12.

Smith-Hanen

S. S.

Effects of nonverbal behaviors on judged levels of counselor warmth and empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1977, 24, 87–91.

13.

Strong

S. R.

Taylor

Bratton

Loper

Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971, 18, 554–562.

14.

Tepper

D. T.

Jr. Haase

R. F.

Verbal and nonverbal communication of facultative conditions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1978, 25, 35–44.

15.

von Cranach

Vine

(Eds.) Social communication and movement. London: Academic Press, 1973.

Eye Contact and Communication of Facilitative Conditions

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References