Abstract
This investigation concerned the problems of confounding style and ability and generalizability in the case of indicators of cognitive reflection-impulsivity. On the basis of an interactional perspective, a number of simple assumptions about response latency and accuracy in cognitive tasks of reflection and impulsivity are developed and tasted in a sample of 46 male adolescents, aged 14 to 17 yr. The results show that the tempo variable and reasoning ability can account for a considerable portion of the inter-individual differences in accuracy. From the viewpoint of general psychology the response latency proves to be partially task-dependent, from the viewpoint of differential psychology it is a partial characteristic of persons and, probably, the real style indicator. The view that cognitive reflection represents a task-specific, problem-oriented adaptation of the conceptual tempo or intensity of alternatives-scanning is supported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
