Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The brightness of colors in a number of paintings by Francis Pratt appeared to vary as a function of the viewing distance. These pictures were composed of narrow strips of different colors varying in brightness and saturation. Five experiments were undertaken to replicate and study this effect under controlled conditions using heterochromatic brightness matching of various pairs of colored stimuli. The subjects were first-year students in psychology, participating as a course requirement. The number of subjects varied in the different experiments, between 6 and 9. The relative brightness of blue as compared to red, orange, and yellow-green varied as a function of viewing distance. The relative brightness of the blue decreased as distance increased. By varying the physical size of the stimuli it was possible to keep the angle subtended at the retina constant for two distances and the effect remained. Any explanation must therefore account for the finding that the effect is not due to the apparent size of the stimuli.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramov

Gordon

Color vision in the peripheral retina: I. Spectral sensitivity. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1977, 67, 195–202.

Boynton

R. M.

Schafer

Neun

M. E.

Hue-wavelength relation measured by color naming method for three retinal locations. Science, 1964, 146, 666–668.

Brindley

G. S.

The summation areas of human color-receptive mechanisms at increment threshold. J. Physiol., 1954, 124, 400–408.

Campbell

F. W.

Gubisch

R. W.

The effect of chromatic aberration on visual acuity. J. Physiol, 1967, 192, 345–358.

Cornsweet

T. N.

Visual perception. London: Academic Press, 1970.

Davidson

Perturbation approach to spatial brightness interaction in human vision. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1968, 58, 1300–1308.

Hering

Ueber den Einfluss der Macula Lutea auf Spectrale Farbengleichungen. Pflueger's Arch. ges. Physiol. Menschen Tiere, 1893, 54, 277–312.

Horner

R. G.

Parslow

E. T.

Dependence of anomaloscope matching on viewing distance or field size. Nature, 1947, 160, 23–24.

Luria

S. M.

Schwartz

Visual acuity under red vs. white illumination. U.S. Navy Med. Res. Lab. Rep. No. 19, Gorton Comm., 1960.

10.

Millodot

Sivak

Influence of accommodation in the chromatic aberration of of the eye. Brit. J. physiol. Optics, 1973, 28, 164–178.

11.

Ogle

K. N.

Blurring of the retinal image and contrast thresholds in the fovea. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1960, 50, 307–315.

12.

Ogle

K. N.

Foveal contrast thresholds with blurring of the retinal image and increasing size of test stimulus. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1961, 51, 862–869.

13.

Ogle

K. N.

Peripheral contrast thresholds and blurring of the retinal image for a point light source. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1961, 51, 1265–1268.

14.

Padgham

C. A.

Saunders

J. E.

The perception of light and colour. London: G. Bell, 1975.

15.

Pokorny

Smith

V. C.

Effect of field size on red-green color mixture equations. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1976, 66, 705–708.

16.

Thomson

L. C.

Wright

W. D.

The color sensitivity of the retina within the central fovea in man. J. Physiol., 1947, 105, 316–331.

17.

Tori

Uemura

Effects of inducing luminance and area upon the apparent brightness of test field. Jap. Psychol. Res., 1965, 7, 86–100.

18.

Wald

Blue blindness in the normal fovea. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1967, 57, 1289–1301.

19.

Walls

G. L.

Factors in human visual resolution. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1943, 33, 487–505.

20.

Willmer

E. N.

The relationship between area and threshold in the central fovea for lights of different colours. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 2, 53–59.

21.

Willmer

E. N.

Subjective brightness and size of field in the central fovea. J. Physiol., 1954, 123, 315–323.

Effect of Distance on Heterochromatic Matching

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References