33 references to theses and reviews are listed. These report work with the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. They originated from a literature search and replies to letters sent to some 1,500 users of record.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AucuttJ. P.The effect of perceptual set on the numerical element of the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Eastern Washington State College, 1967.
2.
BatesJ. B.Use of the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement with adolescents. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Illinois State Normal Univer., Normal, Ill., 1960.
3.
BohnS. E.Simulated-murder responses to the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Washington Univer., St. Louis, Mo., 1967.
4.
DavisL. L.Mental health of cancer patients as a function of group psychotherapy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, California Graduate Institute, 1979.
5.
DruryS. L.Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement: Application of a three arrangement administration in psychodiagnosis. Unpublished M.A. thesis, St. Mary's Univer., San Antonio, Tex., 1970.
6.
GreenleafW. A.Prediction of behaviors occurring in a token economy using the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement and a nomological network. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State Univer., 1972. [Dissert. Abstr., 1972, 33/5–6, 2344B–2345B.]
7.
HefflerA.The Z-A mixed response to the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Georgia State Univer., 1974.
8.
LeisenringJ. G.A cross-validation of the brain damage indices on the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement with Reitan's Test Battery. Unpublished M.S. thesis, New Mexico Highlands Univer., 1970.
9.
LevineL.KTSA-MMPI: A comparison and validation of the KTSA. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Georgia State Univer., Atlanta, 1972.
10.
MarthD. R.Personality traits of management students and business personnel. Unpublished M.A. thesis. North Texas State Univer., Denton, Tex., 1963.
11.
MossR. M.The symbolic perception of pain in the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State Univer., 1976. [Dissert. Abstr., 1977, 37/8, 4157B.]
12.
NevinD. A.Performance of cerebral palsied and normal children on the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Fordham Univer., Bronx, 1966.
13.
PlaumE.Ein Multivariater Ansatz zur Untersuchung Kognitiver Stoerungen bei Schizophrenen. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georg-August-Univer. zu Goettingen, 1975.
14.
RoseA. W.An exploratory investigation comparing the KTSA and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Georgia State Univer., 1973.
15.
RubinE. J.Performance of totally-blind and sighted subjects on tests of abstraction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Fordham Univer., 1963. [Dissert. Abstr., 1964, 24/7–9, 2989–2990.]
16.
SchillerJ. R.The Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement as a predictor of success in college. Unpublished M.S. thesis, School of Clinical and Applied Psychology, Richmond Professional Institute, Richmond, Va, 1964.
17.
SoperP. H.The Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement: A factor analytical approach to its construct and concurrent validity via the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Georgia State Univer., 1974.
18.
Reviews
19.
AllenR. M.Personality assessment procedures. New York: Harper, 1958. Pp. 336–338.
20.
CamposL. P.Other projective techniques. In RabinA. I. (Ed.), Projective techniques in personality assessment. New York: Springer Publ. Co., 1968. Pp. 461–520.
21.
ClarkC. A.Review of KTSA. In BurosO. K. (Ed.), Fifth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, N. J.: Gryphon, 1959. Pp. 145–146.
22.
ColemanJ. C.Abnormal psychology and modern life. (3rd ed.) Chicago, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1964. P. 548.
23.
GoldensonR. M.The encyclopedia of human behavior. Vol. II. Garden City: Doubleday, 1970. P. 794.
24.
HaworthMRabinA.Miscellaneous techniques. In RabinA. I.HaworthM. R. (Eds.), Projective techniques with children. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1960. Pp. 314–330.
25.
HuntH. F.Testing for psychological deficit. In BrowerD.AbeL. E. (Eds.), Progress in clinical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1952. Pp. 91–107.
26.
JessorR.Review of KTSA. In BurosO. K. (Ed.), Fifth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, N. J.: Gryphon, 1959. Pp. 146–147.
27.
LathamJ. L.Human relations in business: A behavioral science approach. Columbus, O.: Merrill Books, 1964. Pp. 113–115.
28.
LoevingerJ.Theory and techniques of assessment. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 1959, 10, 300.
29.
RabinA. I.HurleyJ. R.Projective techniques. In AbtL. E.RiessF. R. (Eds.), Progress in clinical psychology. Vol. 6. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964. P. 18.
30.
SemeonoffB.Projective techniques. New York: Wiley, 1976. Pp. 291–293.
31.
ShafferL. F.Psychological test reviews: KTSA. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 506–507.
32.
ShafferL. F.Review of KTSA. In BurosO. K. (Ed.), Fifth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, N. J.: Gryphon, 1959. P. 147.
33.
ShneidmanE. S. In WolmanB. B. (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965. P. 513.
34.
ShobenE. J.Review of KTSA. In BurosO. K. (Ed.), Fourth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, N. J.: Gryphon, 1953. Pp. 110–111.
