This study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of a programmed unit in reading for 12 (11 black, 1 white, M1Q = 81.33) students selected from Grades 2 and 3 (ages 7-2—9-8) in a K-5 school. Teachers chose from among children who had been in school 2 or 3 yr. and had not learned to read the basic vocabulary words for those grades. Students were administered a criterion test as a pretest. Upon completion of the program the criterion test was readministered. Improvement in recognition was significant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrosN. S.RuschR. R.Trimodal programmed instruction in reading. Journal of Experimental Education, 1974, 42, 1–5.
2.
AryD.JacobsL. C.RazaviehA.Introduction to research in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
DunnL. M.MarkwardtF. C.Peabody Individual Achievement Test manual. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1970.
5.
DurrW. K.A computer study of high-frequency words in popular trade journals. Paper presented at conference of IRA, Anaheim, Calif., 1970.
6.
FricklasR.RuschR.Trimodal reading instruction with inefficient learners. The Slow Learning Child, 1974, 21, 44–52.
7.
GourevitchV.Statistical methods: A problem-solving approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1965.
8.
GredlerG. R.Learning disabilities and reading disorders, a current assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 1978, 15, 226–238. (a)
9.
GredlerG. R.A look at some important factors in assessing readiness for school. Journal of teaming Disabilities, 1978, 11, 284–290. (b)
10.
HardyckC. D.PetrinovichL. S.Introduction to statistics for the behavioral sciences. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1969.
11.
HigginsC. E.Trimodal programmed instruction in reading: Background and rationale. Albany, N. Y.: Learning Research Center, Board of Education, 1971. (a)
12.
HigginsC. E.Trimodal programmed instruction in reading: Description and rationale. Providence: Instructive Devices, Inc., 1971. (b)
