A 4 × 4 × 4 factorial design was used to determine the effects of perceived similarity of source on the acceptance of information about fashion apparel by 48 women. A source perceived to be middle-range in perceived similarity to the subjects was most effective. Innovative and cautious subjects agreed most highly with information presented by different middle-range sources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpertM., & AndersonW.Optimal heterophily and communication effectiveness: some empirical findings. Journal of Communication, 1973, 23, 328–343.
2.
AndersonW., & AlpertM.Optimal heterophily: aid to effective communication. Public Personnel Management, 1974, 3, 279–288.
3.
CraigC. S., & GinterJ. L.An empirical test of a scale for innovativeness. In SchlingerM. J. (Ed.), Advances in consumer research. Vol. II. Ann Arbor: Association of Consumer Research, 1975. Pp. 555–562.
4.
Kaigler-EvansK., & DamhorstM. L.Impression formation: use of descriptors of personal traits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 46, 903–906.
5.
LeavittC., & Kaigler-EvansK.Mere similarity versus information processing: an exploration of source and message interactions. Communication Research, 1975, 2, 300–306.
6.
LeavittC., & WaltonJ.Development of a scale for innovativeness. In SchlingerM. J. (Ed.), Advances in consumer research. Vol. II. Ann Arbor: Association of Consumer Research, 1975. Pp. 545–554.
7.
RogersE.New product adoption and diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 1976, 4, 290–306.
8.
RogersE., & ShoemakerF.Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1971.
9.
SimonsH.Perception and communication. In DavidC. (Ed.), Advances in communication. New York: Harper & Row, 1973. Pp. 215–240.
