Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1979-6
Ipsative vs Normative Interpretation of Test Scores: A Comment on Allen and Foreman's (1976) Norms on Edwards Personal Preference Schedule for Female Australian Therapy Students
A brief review of the literature relating to intra- vs interindividual personality assessment and the lack of logical support for the calculation of T scores using intraindividual data. It concludes with a caution regarding the interpretation of WAIS and MMPI personal profiles which are derived from interindividual scaled scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenL. R.ForemanP. E.Norms on Edwards Personal Preference Schedule for female Australian therapy students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 42, 1233–1234.
2.
AllportG. W.VernonP. E.LindzeyG. A.A Study of Values: Manual of directions.Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1931.
ChaplinJ. P.Dictionary of psychology.New York: Dell, 1974.
5.
ClemansW. V.An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs, 1975, No. 14.
6.
ClossS. J.Ipsative vs normative interpretation of interest test scores or ‘what do you mean by “like”?’Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1976, 29, 289–299.
7.
EdwardsA. L.Manual for the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.New York: Psychological Corp., 1959.
8.
HorstP.Psychological measurement and prediction.Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1966.
9.
JacksonD.An evaluation of forced-choice and true-false item formats in personality assessment. Research Bulletin #250, Department of Psychology, Univer. of Western Ontario, 1971.
10.
KatzM.Interpreting Kuder Preference Record scores: Ipsative or normative?Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1962, 10, 96–100.
11.
TamirP.LunnettaV.A comparison of ipsative and normative procedures in the study of cognitive preferences. Journal of Educational Research, 1977, 71, 86–92.
