The effects of EMG biofeedback training on cursive handwriting were investigated for 4 girls and 5 boys in Grade 4. A significant reduction in EMG between the first baseline session and the last training session was obtained. Four of 5 characteristics of handwriting improved significantly. The need for carefully designed research comparing EMG biofeedback training and relaxation training was indicated. A self-control factor in handwriting was hypothesized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderA.An experimental test of assumptions related to the use of electromyogram biofeedback as a general relaxation training technique. Psychophysiology, 1975, 12, 656–662.
2.
BarschR.Achieving perceptual motor efficiency. Seattle, Wash.: Special Child Publ., 1967.
3.
CarterJ.SynoldsD.Effects of relaxation training upon handwriting qualities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974, 1, 53–55.
4.
De MesK.Visual motor skills: Response characteristics and prereading behavior. Winterhaven, Fla.: Lions Research Found., 1967.
5.
FreedmanR.PapsdorfI.Biofeedback and progressive relaxation treatment of sleep-onset insomnia: A controlled, all-night investigation. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 1976, 1, 253–271.
6.
FrostigM.HorneD.The Frostig Program for the Development of Visual Perception: Teacher's guide. Chicago: Follett, 1964.
7.
JacksonK.HughesH.Effects of relaxation training on cursive handwriting of fourth grade students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 47, 707–712.
8.
KephartN. C.The slow learner in the classroom. New York: Merrill, 1960.
9.
SchandlerS. L.GringsW. W.An examination of methods for producing relaxation during short-term laboratory sessions. Behavior Research & Therapy, 1976, 14, 419–426.
10.
SullivanE.ClarkW.TiegsE.California Short-form Test of Mental Maturity. Monterey, Calif.: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
