To check on the possibility that relative attractiveness rather than sex of model may have been the determinant of inverse and inverted-U curves observed between ratings of variations of pupil size shown in a male and female model, 170 female students were asked to rate photographs of an attractive and an average looking male model, each of which had been altered to create a continuum of pupil sizes. The results indicated that pattern of mean ratings changed as predicted, as a function of relative attractiveness. This finding identifies a variable which may have partially confounded the results of earlier studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HessE. H.The role of pupil size in communication. Scientific American, 1975, 233, 110–119.
2.
HicksR. A.ReaneyH.HillL.Effects of pupil size and facial angle on preference for photographs of a young woman. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 388–390.
3.
JanisseM. P.Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Washington, D. C.: Hemisphere, 1977.
4.
TomlinsonN.HicksR. A.PellegriniR. J.Attributions of female college students to variations in pupil size. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978, in press.
