Witkin's field dependence and Kirton's adaption-innovation theories are compared and a theoretical overlap of concepts is advanced. This is confirmed by field study despite the confounding elements of spatial ability and extraversion in the former theory for male responses. Women's scores on the Embedded Figures Test differ from those of males, and this finding continues to constitute a difficulty for Witkin's theory and use of his measure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrovermanD. M.KlaiberE. L.KobayashiY.VogelW.Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 23–50.
2.
EvansF. J.Field dependence and the Maudsley Personality Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 526.
3.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G.Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: Univer. of London Press, 1964.
4.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G.Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1975.
5.
FranksC. M.Differences déterminées par la personnalité dans la perception visuelle de la verticalité. Revue de Psychologie appliquée, 1956, 6, 235–246.
6.
GardnerR. W.Cognitive controls in adaptation: Research and measurement. In MessickS.RossJ. (Eds.), Measurement in personality and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1962. Pp. 183–198.
GuilfordJ. P.FrickJ. W.ChristensenP. R.MerrifieldP. R.A factor-analytic study of flexibility in thinking. Reports of the Psychological Laboratory, Los Angeles, Univer. of Southern California, 1957, No. 18.
9.
KaganJ.MossH. A.SigelI. E.Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. Monographs of Society for Research in Child Development, 1963, 28, No. 86.
10.
KaganJ.RosmanB. L.DayD.AlbertJ.PhillipsW.Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 1964, 78, No. 1 (Whole No. 578).
11.
KirtonM. J.Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 622–629.
12.
KirtonM.J. Manual of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. London: National Foundation for Educational Research, 1977.
13.
KuhnT. S.The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.) Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1970.
14.
LikertR.QuashaW. H.Manual of the Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test. New York: Psychological Corp., 1970.
15.
MertonR. K. (Ed.) Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1957.
16.
PodellJ. E.PhillipsL.A developmental analysis of cognition as observed in dimensions of Rorschach and objective test performance. Journal of Personality, 1959, 27, 439–463.
17.
RogersC. R.Towards a theory of creativity. In AndersonH. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation. New York: Harper, 1959. Pp. 69–82.
18.
ThurstoneL. L.A factorial study of perception. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1944.
19.
VernonP. E.The distinctiveness of field independence. Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 366–391.
20.
WallachM. A.Commentary, active-analytical vs passive-global cognitive functioning. In MessickS.RossJ. (Eds.), Measurement in personality and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1962. Pp. 199–215.
21.
WeberM.Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. In GerthH. H.MillsC. W. (Eds. and trans.), Prom Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970. Pp. 196–244.
22.
WitkinH. A.Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 1950, 19, 1–15.
