A paired-comparison paradigm was utilized to determine the preferences of 20 young children for listening rate for prose speech. An electronic expansion/compression technique yielded nine rates of speech ranging from 100 wpm to 200 wpm, with intervals of 25 wpm. The results indicated that the children most preferred a listening rate of 200 wpm and least preferred a rate of 100 wpm. Comparisons of the present findings with preference rates of older, post-adolescent children and adults are discussed. Direction for further research with temporal alteration and linguistic constraints on the message are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerryM. D.EricssonR. L.Speaking rate: Effects on children's comprehension of normal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973, 16, 367–374.
2.
BreuelJ. W.LevensL. M.The A.F.B. harmonic compressor. In FoulkeE. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Louisville Conference on Rate and/or Frequency Controlled Speech. Louisville: Univer. of Louisville, 1971. Pp. 185–192.
3.
CainC. J.LassN. J.Listening rate preferences of adults. In DukerS. (Ed.), Time compressed speech: An anthology and bibliography. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974. Pp. 674–679.
4.
CampanellaS. J.Signal analysis of speech time-compression techniques. In FoulkeE. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Louisville Conference on Time-Compressed Speech. Louisville: Univer. of Louisville, 1967. Pp. 108–114.
5.
CarawayK. E.Measurements of speaking rates and oral reading rates for boys in grades four through twelve. Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer. of Kansas, 1965.
FairbanksG.Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.
8.
FairbanksG.EverittW. L.JaegerR. P.Method for time or frequency compression-expansion of speech. Transactions of the Institute of Radio Engineers Professional Group on Audio, AU-2, 1954, 7–12.
9.
FoulkeE.Methods of controlling the word rate of recorded speech. Journal of Communication, 1970, 20, 305–314.
10.
FoulkeE.StichtT. G.Listening rate preferences of college students for literary material of moderate difficulty. Journal of Auditory Research, 1966, 6, 397–401.
11.
GuilfordJ. P.Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
12.
KentR. D.Anatomical and neuromuscular maturation of the speech mechanism: Evidence from acoustic studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19, 421–447.
13.
LassN. J.CainC. J.A correlational study of listening rate preferences and listeners' oral reading rates. Journal of Auditory Research, 1974, 12, 308–312.
14.
LassN. J.FultzV. A.A normative study of children's listening rate preferences. Language and Speech, 1976, 2, 144–149.
15.
LassN. J.LeeperH. A.Listening rate preference: Comparison of two time-alteration techniques. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 1163–1168.
16.
LassN. J.PratherC. E.A comparative study of listening rate preferences for oral reading and impromptu speaking tasks. Journal of Communication, 1973, 23, 95–102.
17.
LeeperH. A.LassN. J.Effects of passage length on listeners' rate preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 1297–1298.
18.
LeeperH. A.WoodardR. E.Temporal characteristics of topic-elicited and picture-elicited speech of children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Oklahoma Speech and Hearing Association, March, 1976.
19.
McCroskeyR.ThompsonN.Comprehension of rate controlled speech by children with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disorders, 1973, 6, 29–35.
20.
RossR. T.Optimal orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons. Educational Psychology, 1934, 25, 375–382.
21.
SchuckersG. H.ShrinerT. H.DaniloffR. G.Auditory assembly of segmented sentences by children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973, 16, 116–127.
22.
TemplinM.Certain language skills in children. Institute of Child Welfare, 1957, Monograph No. 26.
