Slides of unfamiliar individuals were rated on six semantic differential scales by high-dogmatic and low-dogmatic subjects. Subjects were informed that the individuals depicted were either normal, neurotic, or psychotic. Results indicated that diagnostic labels significantly affected the ratings and that one factor (a general Emotional Stability factor) accounted for 77.9% of the rating variance. Level of dogmatism appeared to affect subjects' ratings, although not in the manner predicted.
ChinskyJ. M.RappaportJ.Attitude change in college students and chronic patients: A dual perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 35, 388–394.
3.
GoveW. R.Societal reaction as an explanation of mental illness: An evaluation. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 873–884.
4.
GreenS.LissitzR.MulaikS.Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, 37, 827–838.
5.
HoodR. W.Jr.Dogmatism and opinions about mental illness. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 1283–1290.
6.
JohannsenW. J.Attitudes toward mental patients: A review of empirical research. Mental Hygiene, 1969. 53, 218–288.
7.
LtebermanL. R.Attitudes toward the mentally ill, knowledge of mental illness, and personal adjustment. Psychological Reports, 1970, 26, 47–52.
8.
RabkinJ. G.Opinions about mental illness: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 153–171.
9.
RokeachM.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
10.
RosenA. C.Changes in the perception of mental illness and mental health. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 203–208.
11.
RosenhanD.On being sane in insane places. Science, 1973, 179, 250–258.
