The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between cognitive complexity, a structural variable of cognition, and halo error, a perceptual variable. Data were obtained from 99 subjects who evaluated eight brands of toothpaste and 10 makes of automobiles along with a Bieri Reptest for each product category. As predicted, complexity was significantly and inversely related to the variation in belief ratings (halo) for each brand of toothpaste or make of automobile.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BieriJ.Cognitive structures in personality. In SchroderH. M.SuedfeldP. (Eds.), Personality theory and information processing. New York: Ronald, 1971. Pp. 178–208.
2.
BieriJ.AtkinsA. L.BrianS.LeamanR. L.MillerH.TripodiT.Clinical and social judgment: The discrimination of behavioral information. New York: Wiley, 1966.
3.
BormanW. C.Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 556–560.
4.
BrownE.Influences of training, method, and relationships on the halo effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 195–199.
5.
CraigG.DuckS. W.Similarity, interpersonal attitudes and attraction: The evaluative-descriptive distinction. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 16, 15–21.
6.
DeauxK.FarrisE.Complexity, extremity, and affect in male and female judgments. Journal of Personality, 1975, 43, 379–389.
7.
DurandR. M.LambertZ. V.Generalizability of cognitive differentiation across product and social domains. Psychological Reports, 1976, 39, 665–666.
8.
FishbeinM.A considetation of beliefs and their role in attitude measurement. In FishbeinM. (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1967. Pp. 257–266.
9.
HoganH. W.Complexity, extremity, affect, and threat as dimensions of person perception. Journal of Psychology, 1977, 95, 321–325.
10.
HuberJ.JamesW. L.A measure of halo. In HuntK. H. (Ed.), Advances in consumer research. Vol. 5. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, in press.
11.
IrwinM.TripodiT.BieriJ.Affective stimulus value and cognitive complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 444–448.
12.
JamesW. L.CarterF. S.Halo effects and location preferences. In HuntK. H. (Ed.), Advances in consumer research. Vol. 5. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, in press.
13.
KaplanK. J.FishbeinM.The source of beliefs, their saliency and prediction of attitude. Journal of Social Psychology, 1969, 78, 63–74.
14.
KeavenyT. J.McGannA. F.A comparison of behavioral expectation scales and graphic rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 695–703.
15.
SeamanJ. M.KoenigF.A comparison of measures of cognitive complexity. Sociometry, 1974, 37, 375–390.
16.
SoucarE.Students' perceptions of liked and disliked teachers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 19–24.
17.
SoucarE.Vigilance and the perceptions of teachers and students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 83–86.
18.
StephanW. G.Cognitive differentiation in intergroup perception. Sociometry, 1977, 40, 50–58.
19.
WilkieW.McCannJ.ReibsteinD.Halo effects in brand belief measurement: Implications for attitude model development. In WardS.WrightP. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research. Vol. 1. Urbana: Association for Consumer Research, 1973. Pp. 280–290.
