30 Austrian, 30 British, and 30 American college students were compared in an autokinetic movement task involving 6 target shapes of differing levels of suggested movement. For some of the target shapes differences in responses to implied movement were found among the three groups. Generally, British subjects responded most and Austrian subjects least to implied movement as a function of target shape.
AllportG. W.PettigrewT. F.Cultural influence on the perception of movement: The trapezoidal illusion among Zulus. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 104–113.
3.
BagbyJ.A cross-cultural study of perceptual predominance in binocular rivalry. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 54, 331–338.
4.
BorresenC. R.Autokinetic movement as a function of the implied movement of target shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 89–92.
5.
BorresenC. R.WolfM.Autokinetic movement as a function of the symbolic meaning of the target shape. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 42, 723–726.
6.
BorresenT. J.Autokinetic movement, real movement and target dynamics. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972, 8, 870.
7.
ComalliP. E.Jr.WernerH.WapnerS.Studies in physiognomic perception: Effects of directional dynamics and meaning induced sets in autokinetic motion. Journal of Psychology, 1957, 43, 289–299.
8.
FisherS.Achievement theme and direction of autokinetic movement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 61–68.
9.
MichaelD. N.A cross-cultural investigation of closure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953, 48, 255–259.
