Abstract
Data on satisfaction with the work itself were obtained from incumbents in 15 jobs. Job-scope scores for the same jobs were determined using data from incumbents, peers, and supervisors. Correlational analyses involving these measures showed that (a) the three sets of job-scope scores were highly related ro one another and (b) satisfaction could be predicted as well with job-scope scores of peers or supervisors as it could with scores of incumbents. Implications for research in which ratings of jobs are required, e.g., job enrichment studies, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
