Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In a series of exploratory studies to develop instruments for measuring field dependence in young children, a total of 312 Japanese middle-class children, ages 5 to 6, served as subjects. Without changing the essential nature of the original test, the geometric Embedded-figures test attained relatively high internal consistency (KR-20 in the .80's) and stability (R = .83 to .52, at intervals of 1.5 to 13 mo.). Correlation pattern between the Embedded Figures Test and Wechsler subscales similar to that of older subjects was influenced by the speed factor in embedded figures and Wechsler performance scales. Correlation between Kato's portable Rod-and-frame test and embedded figures was significant only in boys. In addition, the correlation pattern between the rod and frame and the preschool Wechsler was not consistent with Witkin's conceptualization. A newly developed darkroom Rod-and-Frame Test correlated with embedded figures for both sexes. Additional analyses indicated the need for more refined instructions to subjects regarding the concept of upright. Some children had more than one anchoring point for responding. Nyborg's scoring method and the relationship of Piagetian spatial concept to rod-and-frame performance are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersson

A. L.

Ruuth

Relation between spiral aftereffect duration and Rod-and-frame test performance in early childhood. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 843–849.

Banta

T. J.

Tests for evaluation of early childhood education: The Cincinnati Autonomy Test Battery (CATB). In Hellmuth

(Ed.), Cognitive studies. Vol. 1. New York: Brunner-Mazel, 1970. Pp. 424–490.

Coates

Preschool Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1972.

Cronbach

L. J.

Snow

R. E.

Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington, 1977.

Dreyer

A. S.

Dreyer

C. A.

Nebelkopf

E. B.

Portable Rod-and-frame test as a measure of cognitive style in kindergarten children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 775–781.

Goodenough

D. R.

Eagle

C. J.

A modification of the Embedded-figures test for use with young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1963, 103, 67–74.

Goodenough

D. R.

Karp

S. A.

Field dependence and intellectual functioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 241–246.

Kato

The validity and reliability of new rod frame test. Japanese Psychological Research, 1965, 7, 120–125.

Kogan

Cognitive styles in infancy and early childhood. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1976.

10.

LaCrosse

J. E.

The relationship between Piagetian stage of spatial concept development and Rod-and-frame test performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1965.

11.

Morell

J. A.

Age, sex, training, and the measurement of field dependence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976, 22, 100–112.

12.

Nippon Shinri Tekisei Kenkyusho. Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagaku-sha, 1969. (In Japanese).

13.

Nyborg

A method for analysing performance in the rod-and-frame test: I. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974, 15, 119–123.

14.

Nyborg

Isaksen

A method for analysing performance in the rod-and-frame test: II. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974, 15, 124–126.

15.

Pascual-Leone

Piaget's period of concrete operations and Witkin's field dependence: A study on college students and children. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal, 1966.

16.

Pysh

The relationship of field-dependence-independence to performance on Piagetian-type tasks incorporating the Euclidean coordinate system. Western Psychologist, 1970, 1, 137–143.

17.

Salkind

N. J.

Kojima

Cognitive tempo in Japanese and American children. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March, 1977.

18.

Vaught

G. M.

Pittman

M. D.

Roodin

P. A.

Developmental curves for the portable rod-and-frame test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975, 5, 151–152.

19.

Wechsler

Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corp., 1967.

20.

Willemsen

Buchholz

Budrow

M. S.

Geannacopulos

Relationship between Witkin's rod-and-frame task and Piaget's water-line task for college women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 958.

21.

Witkin

H. A.

Dyk

R. B.

Faterson

H. F.

Goodenough

D. R.

Karp

S. A.

Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.

22.

Witkin

H. A.

Goodenough

D. R.

Field dependence revisited. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1976. (Research Bulletin RB-76-39).

23.

Witkin

H. A.

Goodenough

D. R.

Karp

S. A.

Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 291–300.

24.

Witkin

H. A.

Moore

C. A.

Goodenough

D. R.

Cox

P. W.

Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47, 1–64.

25.

Witkin

H. A.

Oltman

P. K.

Raskin

Karp

S. A.

A manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1971.

Assessment of Field Dependence in Young Children

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References