Research testing the validity of the hypothesis that Card IV of the Rorschach can be viewed as the “father” card and Card VII, the “mother” card was reviewed. Essentially the research suggests that such symbolic interpretation of the Rorschach stimuli is most characteristic of children and in particular emotionally disturbed children, but not adults, either normal or schizophrenic. The assumption that Cards IV and VII have universal symbolic meaning was, thus, called into question. A critical analysis of the research stratagems used in testing this hypothesis was offered and some suggestions made for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenR. M.Elements of Rorschach interpretation. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.
2.
BeckN.HerronW. G.The meaning of the Rorschach cards for children. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1969, 33, 150–153.
3.
BeckS. J.Rorschach's test. I. Basic processes. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1950.
4.
BochnerR.HalpernF.The clinical application of the Rorschach test. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1942.
5.
BrownF.An exploratory study of the dynamic factors in the content of the Rorschach protocol. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1953, 17, 251–279.
6.
ColeS.WilliamsR.Age as a determinant of parental interpretation of Rorschach Cards IV and VII. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 55–58.
7.
ColeS.WilliamsR. L.MooreC. H.Parental interpretations of Rorschach Cards IV and VII among adjusted and maladjusted subjects. Journal of General Psychology, 1969, 81, 131–135.
8.
EngelC.The relationship between Rorschach responses and attitudes toward parents. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1959, 23, 311–314.
9.
FrankG.On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: I. The relationship between color and affect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 43, 411–427.
10.
HafnerA.J. Rorschach card stimulus value for children. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1961, 25, 166–169.
11.
HafnerA. J.RosenE.The meaning of Rorschach inkblot responses and determinants as perceived by children. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1964, 28, 192–200.
12.
HirschensteinR.RabinA. I.Reactions to Rorschach cards IV and VII as a function of parental availability in childhood. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 19, 473–474.
13.
KamanoD. K.Symbolic significance of Rorschach Cards IV and VII. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1960, 16, 50–52.
14.
KlopferB.KellyE. L.The Rorschach technique. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N. Y.: World Book, 1942.
15.
LevyE.Stimulus-value of the Rorschach cards for children. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1958, 22, 293–296.
16.
LevyN.Affective preference for Card IV or VII of the Rorschach as related to sex and age. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 28, 741–742.
17.
LindnerR. M.Content analysis in Rorschach work. Rorschach Research Exchange, 1946, 10, 121–129.
18.
LittleK. B.Connotations of the Rorschach inkblots. Journal of Personality, 1959, 27, 397–406.
19.
LoiselleR. H.FisherV.ParrishC. E.Stimulus value of Rorschach inkblots and percepts as perceived by children and schizophrenics. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1968, 32, 238–245.
20.
MagnussenM. G.ColeJ. K.Further evidence of the Rorschach card stimulus value for children: a partial replication (and generalization). Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1967, 31(1), 44–47.
21.
MarshL. F.Parental attitudes as the bases for attributing meaning to Rorschach Cards IV and VII. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1961, 25, 69–74.
22.
MayerT.BinzE.Stimulus values of Rorschach cards. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1961, 17, 186–187.
23.
MeerB.SingerJ. L.A note on the “father” and “mother” cards in the Rotschach inkblots. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1950, 14, 482–484.
24.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Ill.: Univer. of Illinois Press, 1957.
25.
PhillipsL.SmithJ.Rorschach interpretation: advanced technique. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1953.
26.
PiotrowskiZ.Perceptanalysis. New York: Macmillan, 1957.
27.
RabinA. I.A contribution to the “meaning” of Rorschach's inkblots via the semantic differential. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1959, 23, 368–372.
28.
RapaportD.GillM.SchaferR.Diagnostic psychological testing. New York: Year Book, 1946.
29.
RichardsT. W.Personal significance of Rorschach figures. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1958, 22, 97–101.
30.
RorschachH.Psychodiagnostics. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1951.
31.
RosenE.Symbolic meaning in the Rorschach cards: a statistical study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1951, 7, 239–244.
32.
RosenE.Connotative meanings of Rorschach inkblots, responses, and determinants. Journal of Personality, 1960, 28, 412–426.
33.
SappenfieldB. R.Perception of masculinity-femininity in Rorschach blots and responses. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1961, 17, 373–376.
34.
SchleiferM. J.HireA. W.Stimulus values of Rorschach inkblots expressed as trait and affective characteristics. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1960, 24, 164–170.
35.
SinesJ. O.An approach to the study of the stimulus significance of the Rorschach inkblots. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1960, 24, 64–66.
36.
TaniguchiM.DeVosG.MurakamiE.Identification of mother and father cards on the Rorschach by Japanese normal and delinquent adolescents. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1958, 22, 453–460.
37.
ThakurG. P.ThakurM.Symbolic meanings of Rorschach Cards II, IV, and VII. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 190.
38.
ZaxM.BenhamF. G.Stimulus value of the Rorschach inkblots as perceived by children. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1961, 25, 233–237.
39.
ZaxM.LoiselleR. H.Stimulus value of Rorschach inkblots as measured by the semantic differential. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1960, 16, 160–163.
40.
ZaxM.LoiselleR. H.KarrasA.Stimulus characteristics of Rorschach inkblots as perceived by a schizophrenic sample. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1960, 24, 439–443.
41.
ZelinM.SechrestL.The validity of the “mother” and “father” cards of the Rorschach. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1963, 27, 114–121.
