The study of withdrawal from college has a long history. There continue, however, to be misconceptions about the actual rate of withdrawal and graduation. The present review brings together the conclusions from a large number of studies as well as some criticisms of these conclusions. It also makes clear how important it is to divide withdrawers into various subgroups and to follow them longitudinally if we are to obtain accurate data on graduation rates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstinA. W.Personal and environmental factors associated with college dropouts among high aptitude students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 55, 219–227.
2.
CoffeltJ. J.HobbsD. S.In and out of college: A longitudinal study of the 1962 freshman class in Oklahoma colleges: Report 1. the first year.Oklahoma City, Okla.: Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 1964.
3.
ConnerJ. D.The relationship between college environmental press and freshman attrition at Southern Methodist University. Dissertation Abstracts, 1966, 27, 946-A.
4.
CopeR. G.HewittR. G.Types of college dropouts: An environmental press approach. College Student Journal, 1971, 5, 46–51.
5.
CurtisJ. R.CurtisT. E.A study of dropouts at the University of North Carolina. Journal of the American College Health Association, 1966, 14, 140–146.
6.
EcklandB. K.College dropouts who came back. Harvard Educational Review, 1964, 34, 402–420.
7.
EcklandB. K.A source of error in college attrition studies. Sociology of Education, 1964, 38, 60–72.
8.
FarnsworthD. L.College dropouts. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 1969, 52, 209–210, 217.
9.
FordD. H.UrbanH. B.College dropouts: Successes or failures? In PervinL. A.ReikL. E.DalrympleW. (Eds.), The college dropout and the utilization of talent.Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univer. Press, 1966. Pp. 83–106.
10.
GadzellaB. M.Factors influencing students to withdraw from college. College Student Survey, 1967, 1, 55–60.
11.
GoetzW.LeachD.The disappearing student. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1967, 45, 883–887.
12.
GurinG.NewcombT.CopeR. G.Characteristics of entering freshmen related to attrition in the literary college of a large state university.Ann Arbor, Mich.: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, Univer. of Michigan, 1968. (Office of Education, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Project No. 1938).
13.
HornerD. R.An analysis of persisters and non-persisters at the University of Nebraska. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970, 30(7-A), 2850.
14.
IffertR. E.Retention and withdrawal of college students.Washington, D. C.: U. S. Gov't Print. Office, 1957. (U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Bulletin 1958, No. 1).
15.
IffertR. E.ClarkeB. S.College applicants, entrants, dropouts.Washington, D. C.: U. S. Gov't Print. Office, 1965. (U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education Bulletin 1965, No. 29).
16.
KnoellD.Institutional research on retention and withdrawal. In SpragueH. T. (Ed.), Research on college students.Berkeley, Calif.: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 1960. Pp. 41–65.
17.
KnoellD.A critical review of research on college dropouts. In PervinL. A.ReikL. E.DalrympleW. (Eds.), The college dropout and the utilization of talent.Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univer. Press, 1966. Pp. 63–81.
18.
LinsL. J.AbellA. P.Survey of fall 1963 Madison campus prior to the beginning of third semester after entrance.Madison, Wisc.: Office of Institutional Studies, Univer. of Wisconsin, 1966. (Mimeo).
19.
MacKinnonD. W.Identifying and developing creativity. In HeistP. (Ed.), The creative college student: An unmet challenge.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968. Pp. 101–116.
20.
MaxP.How many graduate?College and University, 1969, 45, 63–76.
21.
McIntoshB.WilsonL.LipinskiB.The extent and nature of student attrition in the first five years at Simon Fraser University. Canadian Counsellor, 1974, 8(3), 163–174.
22.
McNeelyJ. H.College student mortality.Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Interior, Gov't Print. Office, 1938. (Bulletin No. 11, 1937).
23.
MockK. R.YoungeG.Students' intellectual attitudes, aptitude, and persistence at the University of California.Berkeley: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, 1969.
24.
Office of the Dean of Women.Voluntary non-returns.Ann Arbor: Univer. of Michigan, 1960. (Mimeo).
25.
PanosR. J.AstinA. W.Attrition among college students. American Educational Research Journal, 1968, 5, 57–72.
26.
PervinL. A.ReikL. E.DalrympleW.Personal determinants and their interaction with environment. In PervinL. A.ReikL. E.DalrympleW. (Eds.), The college dropout and the utilization of talent.Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univer. Press, 1966. Pp. 11–130.
27.
PopeR. V.Factors affecting the elimination of women students from selected coeducational colleges of liberal arts.New York: Teachers College, Columbia Univer., 1931.
28.
RichardsonL. H.The commuter college student's problem in synthesizing his life in a fragmented developmental setting. Journal of the American College Health Association, 1967, 15, 302–306.
29.
SextonV. S.Factors contributing to attrition in college populations: Twenty-five years of research. Journal of General Psychology, 1965, 72, 301–326.
30.
StordahlK.Influences on voluntary withdrawal from college. College and University, 1970, 45, 163–171.
31.
SummerskillJ.Dropouts from college. In SanfordN. (Ed.), The American college.New York: Wiley, 1962. Pp. 627–657.
32.
TimmonsF. R.Personality and demographic factors associated with freshman withdrawal from college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Colorado, 1972.
