A (non-zero-sum) chicken game served as base for exploring the semantic nature of social interdependence. Behavioral subgroups of cooperators vs competitors, and of preemptors vs victims rated impressions of Self, Other, and Experimenter on a standardized semantic differential (Ertel). Results supported (1) the basic stability and generality of the instrument when applied to social interaction phenomena, (2) its grasp of patterns of interdependence projected into semantic space, (3) the theoretical usefulness of the concept of an “affective reaction system” (Osgood) that also operates in social interdependence, transcending the rational premises of classical game theory, and (4) the methodological usefulness of extending the rating procedure to the experimenter in further illuminating the social psychology of laboratory experimentation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbricJ. C.KahanJ. P.The effects of representations and behavior in experimental games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 2, 129–144.
2.
AlexanderC. N.Jr.KnightG. W.Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry, 1971, 34, 65–82.
3.
AlexanderC. N.Jr.WeilH. G.Players, persons, and purposes: Situational meaning and the prisoner's dilemma game. Sociometry, 1969, 32, 121–144.
4.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
5.
EllsJ. G.SermatV.Motivational determinants of choice in chicken and prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1968, 12, 374–380.
ErtelS.Standardisierung eines Eindrucksdifferentials. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 1965, 12, 22–58.
8.
JohnsonM. P.EwensW.Power relations and affective style as determinants of confidence in impression formation in a game situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 98–110.
9.
JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WinerB.Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1972.
10.
KleinkeC. L.PohlenP. D.Affective and emotional responses as a function of other person's gaze and cooperativeness in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 308–313.
11.
McDougallW.An introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen, 1908.
12.
MessickD. M.McClintockC. G.Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968, 4, 1–25.
13.
MironM. S.Universal semantic differential shell game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 313–320.
14.
OsgoodC. E.Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 10–28.
15.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: Univer. of Illinois Press, 1957.
16.
PlonM.“Jeux” et conflits. In MosçoviciS. (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale. Paris: Larousse, 1972. Pp. 239–271.
17.
RapoportA.Prospects for experimental games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1968, 12, 461–470.
18.
RapoportA.Games as tools of psychological research. In BuchlerI. R.NutiniH. G. (Eds.), Game theory in the behavioral sciences. Pittsburgh: Univer. of Pittsburgh Press, 1969. Pp. 129–150.
19.
RapoportA.ChammahA. M.Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 831–838.
20.
RapoportA.ChammahA. M.The game of chicken. In BuchlerI. R.NutiniH. G. (Eds.), Game theory in the behavioral sciences. Pittsburgh: Univer. of Pittsburgh Press, 1969. Pp. 151–175.
21.
ReedT. R.Connotative meaning of social interaction concepts: An investigation of factor structure and the effects of imagined contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 306–312.
