A new quantitative measure of the physical symmetry of 2-dimensional shapes is proposed which relates it to the proportion of translational and rotational (TR) overlap between a figure and its mirror image. Category ratings of the apparent vertical symmetry of distorted diamond figures correlate highly with this measure while it is also an important contributor in the prediction of the apparent symmetry and geometricity of random polygons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoultM. D.Prediction of perceptual responses from structural characteristics of the stimulus. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1960, 11, 261–268.
2.
AttneaveF.Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 53, 221–227.
3.
AttneaveF.Triangles as ambiguous figures. American Journal of Psychology, 1968, 81, 447–453.
4.
AttneaveF.ArnoultM. D.The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 452–471.
5.
BraineL.A developmental analysis of the effect of stimulus orientation on recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 1972, 85, 157–187.
6.
BrownD. M.HitchcockL.Jr.MichelsK. M.Quantitative studies in form perception: An evaluation of the role of selected stimulus parameters in the visual discrimination performance of human subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 14, 519–529.
7.
BruceV. G.MorganM.Violations of symmetry and repetition in visual patterns. Perception, 1975, 4, 239–249.
8.
CooperL. A.Mental rotation of random 2-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 20–43.
9.
DixonW. J. (Ed.) BMD biomedical computer programs. Berkeley: Univer. of California Press, 1974.
10.
GhentL.Form and its orientation: A child's eye view. American Journal of Psychology, 1961, 74, 177–190.
11.
GhentL.Effect of orientation on recognition of geometric forms by retarded children. Child Development, 1964, 35, 1127–1136.
12.
HarrisL. J.SchallerM. J.Reply to Braine: Re-examination of a child's eye view. American Journal of Psychology, 1973, 86, 655–660.
13.
HitchcockL.Jr.MichelsK. M.BrownD. R.Discrimination learning: Squirrels vs raccoons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 405–414.
14.
HowardI. P.TempletonW. B.Human spatial orientation. New York: Wiley, 1966.
15.
MichelsK. M.PittmanG. G.HitchcockL.Jr.BrownD. R.Visual discrimination: Tree squirrels and quantified stimulus dimensions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 443–450.
16.
RockI.The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment. American Journal of Psychology, 1956, 69, 513–528.
17.
RockI.Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
SchallerM. J.HarrisL. J.“Upright” orientations of forms change with subject age and with features of form. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 17, 179–188.
20.
SerpellR.Preference for specific orientation of abstract shapes among Zambian children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1971, 2, 225–239.
21.
ZusneL.Visual perception of form. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
22.
ZusneL.MichelsK. M.Geometricity of visual form. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 14, 147–154. (a)
23.
ZusneL.MichelsK. M.More on the geometricity of visual form. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 55–58. (b)
