This article reviewed 20 recent studies which investigated preference for visual arts stimuli. Each study was examined in terms of research objective, methods, and results. Two conclusions were evident: (a) researchers have made no concentrated effort to isolate specific dimensions of stimuli in visual art which are critical to understanding preference judgments and (b) researchers appear to have little interest in relating findings to broad theoretical issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneD. E.Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
2.
BerlyneD. E.Uniformity in variety: Extension to three-element visual patterns and to non-verbal measures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1972, 26, 277–291.
3.
BernardY.Sex influence in aesthetic behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 34, 663–666.
4.
ChildI.Observations on the meaning of some measures of esthetic sensitivity. Journal of Psychology, 1964, 57, 49–64.
5.
ChildI.IwaoS.Personality and esthetic sensitivity: Extension of findings to younger age and to different cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 8, 308–312.
6.
EisenmanR.RobinsonN.Complexity-simplicity, creativity, intelligence, and other correlates. Journal of Psychology, 1967, 67, 331–334.
7.
GoudeG.A multidimensional scaling approach to the perception of art: 1. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1972, 13, 258–271.
8.
IwaoS.ChildI.GarciaM.Further evidence of agreement between Japanese and American esthetic evaluations. Journal of Social Psychology, 1969, 78, 11–15.
9.
JamisonK.A note on the relationship between extraversion and aesthetic preferences. Journal of General Psychology, 1972, 87, 301–302.
10.
KleinS.Using points of view and multidimensional scaling analyses to describe esthetic judgment. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention, APA, 1968, 3, 447–448.
11.
KleinS.SkagerR.“Spontaneity vs deliberateness” as a dimension of esthetic judgment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 25, 161–168.
12.
KleinkeC.GitlinK.SegalH.Effect of perceived looking time on evaluation of paintings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 37, 421–422.
13.
KlossM.DregerR.Abstract art preference and temperament traits: A study in the psychology of aesthetics. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1971, 35, 375–378.
14.
LovelessE.Dimensions of preference for modern art. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention, APA, 1968, 3, 445–446.
15.
MachotkaP.Aesthetic criteria in childhood: Justifications of preference. Child Development, 1966, 37, 877–885.
16.
MertonR. K.On theoretical sociology. New York: Free Press, 1967.
17.
MunsingerH.KessenW.Stimulus variability and cognitive change. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 164–178.
18.
NelsonT.MacDonaldG.Lateral organization, perceived depth and title reference in pictures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 983–986.
19.
OsborneJ.FarleyF.The relationship between aesthetic preference and visual complexity in abstract art. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 69–70.
20.
RosenbluhE.OwensG.PohlbrM.Art preference and personality. British Journal of Psychology, 1972, 63, 441–443.
21.
RoubertouxP.CarlierM.ChaguiboffJ.Preference for non-objective art: Personal and psychosocial determiners. British Journal of Psychology, 1971, 62, 105–110.
22.
RumpE. E.Is there a general factor of preference for creativity. Perception and Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 346–348.
23.
RumpE.SouthgateV.Variables affecting aesthetic appreciation in relation to age. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966, 37, 58–72.
24.
RunkleP.McGrathJ.Research on human behavior. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
25.
SalkindL.SalkindN.A measure of aesthetic preference. Studies in Art Education, 1973, 15, 21–27.
26.
ShapiroM.Style. In KroeberA. L. (Ed.), Anthropology today. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1953. Pp. 287–312.
27.
SkagerR.SchultzC.KleinS.The multidimensional scaling of a set of artistic drawings: Perceived structure and scale correlates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 22, 83–94.
28.
SwartzP.HewittD.Lateral organization in pictures and aesthetic preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 30, 991–1007.
29.
SwartzP.SwartzS.Lateral organization in pictures and aesthetic preference: II. A predictive study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 319–324.
30.
WilsonG.AusmanJ.MathewsT.Conservatism and art preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 286–288.
