Group discussions (n = 210) were held in rooms of high or low spatial density. In high-density settings, subjects (n = 110) perceived the discussions as less beneficial and cooperative, but density did not affect subjects' perception of their own contribution to the groups. Subjects (n = 107) who were depersonalized found the groups more friendly and the task less frustrating than their personalized counterparts (n = 103).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanI.The environment and social behavior. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1975.
2.
CalhounJ. B.Population density and social pathology. Scientific American, 1962, 206, 139–148.
3.
ChristianJ. J.Adrenocortical, splenic and reproduction responses of mice to inanition and grouping. Endocrinology, 1959, 65, 189–197.
4.
FreedmanJ. L.Crowding and behavior. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
5.
GalleO. R.GroveW. R.McPhersonJ. H.Population density and pathology: What are the relations for man?Science, 1972, 176, 23–30.
6.
KernerO.Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorder. New York: Bantam Books, 1968.
7.
LatanéB.DarleyJ.The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
8.
LawrenceE. S.Science and sentiment: Overview of research on crowding and human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 712–720.
9.
LooC.Important issues in researching the effects of crowding on humans. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1973, 4, 219–226.
10.
MarsdenH. M.Crowding and animal behavior. Paper presented at American Psychological Association annual meeting, Miami, 1970.
11.
MilgramS.The experience of living in cities. Science, 1970, 167, 1461–1468.
12.
RussellC.RussellW. M.Violence … what are its roots?New Society, 1968, 317, 595–600.
13.
SchmittR. C.Density, health, and social disorganization. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1966, 32, 38–40.
14.
StokolsD.A social-psychological model of human crowding phenomena. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1972, 38, 72–83.
15.
ThiessenD. D.Population density, mouse genotype and endocrine function in behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964, 57, 412–416.
16.
WinsboroughH. H.The social consequences of high population density. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1955, 30, 120–126.
