To determine whether individuals showing vivid imagery would produce more Movement responses on the Rorschach, subjects high and low in visual imagery (ns = 14) were compared. Contrary to previous reports, no positive relationships were found between visual imagery and Rorschach M.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckS. J.BeckA. G.LevittE. E.MolishH. B.Rorschach's test: I. Basic processes. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1961.
2.
HughesR.A comparison of self-report and performance method for assessing visual imagery vividness. Unpublished dissertation, Univer. of Wyoming, 1974.
3.
KorchinS. J.Modern clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1976.
4.
MaherB.Principles of psychopathology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
5.
MarksD. F.Individual differences in the vividness of visual imagery and their effect on function. In SheehanP. W. (Ed.), Function and nature of imagery. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Chap. 4.
6.
Meili-DworetzkiG.Development of perception in the Rorschach. In KlopferB. (Ed.), Developments in the Rorschach technique. New York: World Book Co., 1956. Chap. 5.
RichardsonA.Mental imagery. New York: Springer, 1969.
9.
SarbinT. R.Imagining as muted role-taking: An historical-linguistic analysis. In SheehanP. W. (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 333–354.
10.
SheehanP. W.NeisserU.Some variables affecting the vividness of imagery in recall. British Journal of Psychology, 1969, 60, 71–80.
11.
TruaxC. B.MitchellK. M.Research on certain therapist interpersonal skills in relation to process and outcome. In BerginA. E.GarfieldS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1971. Pp. 299–344.
