Judgments of articulatory place of production were obtained for a set of consonant-vowel nonsense syllables spoken with a known place of production by two normal speakers. Correspondence between judgments and actual place of production was poor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChomskyN.HalleM.The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper, 1968.
2.
CrockerJ. R.A phonological model of children's articulation competence. J. speech hear, Disord., 1969, 34, 203–213.
3.
McReynoldsL. V.BennetS.Distinctive feature generalization in articulation training. J. speech hear. Disord., 1972, 37, 462–470.
4.
McReynoldsL. V.HustonK.A distinctive feature analysis of children's misarticulations. J. speech hear. Disord., 1973, 6, 155–166.
5.
MenyukP.The role of distinctive features in children's acquisition of phonology. J. speech hear. Res., 1968, 11, 138–146.
6.
PollackE.ReesN. S.Disorders of articulation: Some clinical applications of distinctive feature theory. J. speech hear. Disord., 1972, 37, 451–461.
7.
PratherE. M.HedrickD. L.KernC. A.Articulation development in children aged two to four years. J. speech hear. Disord., 1975, 40, 179–191.
8.
ShibataS.A study of dynamic palatography. Ann. Bull. Res. Inst. Logoped. Phoniat. Univer. Tokyo, 1968, 2, 28–36. [Cited in HardcastleW. J., The use of electropalatography in phonetic research. Phonetica, 1972, 25, 197–215.]
9.
SinghS.PolenS.Use of a distinctive feature model in speech pathology. Acta Symbolica, 1972, 3, 17–25.
10.
WalshH.On certain practical inadequacies of distinctive feature systems. J. speech hear. Disord., 1974, 39, 32–43.
