Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine empirically effects of the violation of assumptions of normality and of measurement scales on the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. The effects of such violations were studied separately and in combination for samples of varying size from 5 to 60. Monte Carlo procedures were used to generate populations of scores for four basic distributions: normal, positively skewed, negatively skewed, and leptokurtic. Samples of varying sizes were then randomly selected from specific populations. Results of the study were based on distributions of rs which were calculated on 5,000 sets of samples of n = 5 or n = 15 and 3,000 sets of samples of n = 30 and n = 60. Results indicated that the Pearson r is insensitive to rather extreme violations of the basic assumptions of normality and type of measurement scale. Failure to meet the basic assumptions separately or in combinations had little effect upon the obtained distributions of rs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

B. O.

Hardyck

C. D.

Petrinovich

L. F.

Weak measurements vs strong statistics: An empirical critique of S. S. Stevens' prescriptions on statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1966, 26, 291–309.

Baker

G. A.

The significance of the product-moment coefficient of correlation with special reference to the character of the marginal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1930, 25, 387–396.

Boneau

C. A.

The effects of violations of assumptions underlying the t test. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 57, 49–64.

Bradley

J. V.

Distribution-free statistical tests. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

Dixon

W. J.

Massey

F. J.

Jr.

Introduction to statistical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.

Dunlap

H. F.

An empirical determination of means, standard deviations and correlation coefficients drawn from rectangular populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1931, 2, 66–81.

Ferguson

G. A.

Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Guilford

J. P.

Fruchter

Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.

Hammersley

J. M.

Handscomb

D. C.

Monte Carlo methods. New York: Wiley, 1965.

10.

Havlicek

L. L.

Peterson

N. L.

Robustness of the t test: A guide for researchers on effect of violation of assumptions. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, 1095–1114.

11.

Hays

W. L.

Winkler

R. L.

Statistics: Probability, inference, and decision. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.

12.

Horowitz

L. M.

Elements of statistics for psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

13.

McNemar

Psychological statistics. New York: Wiley, 1962.

14.

Norris

R. C.

Hjelm

H. F.

An empirical investigation of the effects of nonnormality upon the sampling distribution of the product moment correlation coefficient. Nashville: George Peabody College, 1960.

15.

Norton

D. W.

An empirical investigation of the effects of nonnormality and heterogeneity upon the F-test of analysis of variance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State Univer. of Iowa, Ames, 1952.

16.

Nunnally

J. C.

Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

17.

Pearson

E. S.

The test of significance for the correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1932, 27, 128–134. (a).

18.

Pearson

E. S.

The test of significance for the correlation coefficient: Some further results. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1932, 27, 424–426. (b).

19.

Rider

P. R.

On the distribution of the correlation coefficient in small samples. Biometrika, 1932, 24, 382–403.

20.

Siegel

Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

Robustness of the Pearson Correlation against Violations of Assumptions

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References