Five future points of time (range: 1977 to 2034), described in terms of either (A) year number, or (B) “after N years,” were scaled using two different types of scaling method. Subjective temporal distance was in each case a power function of chronological time, the exponent being consistently lower in Condition A than in B. A corresponding difference was found when subjects rated how threatening they experienced each of three events to be when the events were assumed to take place at the five alternative points of time. Experienced threat decreased exponentially with increasing temporal distance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenJ.Psychological time in health and disease. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1967.
2.
EkmanG.LundbergU.Emotional reaction to past and future events as a function of temporal distance. Acta Psychologica, 1971, 35, 430–441.
3.
GormanB. S.WessmanA. E.SchmiedlerG. R.ThayerS.MannucciE. G.Linear representation of temporal location and Stevens's law. Memory & Cognition, 1973, 1, 169–171.
LundbergU.A further study of emotional involvement in past and future events. Reports, Psychological Laboratories, University of Stockholm, 1973, No. 390.
6.
LundbergU.von WrightJ. M.FrankenhaeuserM.OlsonU. J.Note on involvement in future events as a function of temporal distance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 39, 841–842.
7.
LundbergU.von WrightJ. M.FrankenhaeuserM.OlsonU. J.Involvement in four future events as a function of temporal distance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1975, 16, 2–6.
8.
von WrightJ. M.KinnunenR.Scaling of involvement in personal and global events. Psychological Reports of University of Turku, 1976, No. 22.
