Two methods of assessing personal space in young children were examined in a group of 24 boys and 24 girls, aged 3 to 6 yr. When sex of peer figures and affect attributed to them were varied, 3-yr.-olds made distance-cue judgments based on affect but failed to use affect cues in structuring personal space. However, 4- to 6-yr.-olds readily perceived and used distance to communicate the affective quality of peer relations. On both measures, perception of distance cues increased with age. Only girls also used sex of figures as a social cue in depicting appropriate distances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinsworthM.Infancy in Uganda. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer. Press, 1967.
2.
DoseyM.MeiselsM.Personal space and self-protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 93–97.
3.
GerberB. L.Psychological distance in families of normal, disturbed and learning problem children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 139–147.
4.
GerberB. L.KaswanT.Expression of emotion through family grouping schemata, distance and interpersonal focus. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 370–377.
5.
GuardoC. J.Personal space in children. Child Development, 1969, 40, 143–151.
6.
GuardoC. J.MeiselsM.Child-parent spatial patterns under praise and reproof. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5, 365.
KingM. G.Interpersonal relations in preschool children and average approach distance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1966, 109, 109–116.
9.
KuetheJ. L.Social schemas. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 31–38.
10.
KuetheJ. L.The pervasive influence of social schemata. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 248–254.
11.
LittleK. B.Personal space. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 237–247.
12.
LittleK. B.Cultural variations in social schemata. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10, 1–7.
13.
LomranzJ.ShapiroA.ChoreshN.GilatY.Children's personal space as a function of age and sex. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 541–545.
14.
MeiselsM.GuardoC.Development of personal space schemata. Child Development, 1969, 40, 1167–1178.
15.
MelsonG. F.Sex differences in proxemic behavior and personal space schemata. Sex Roles, in press.
16.
PedersenD. M.Developmental trends in personal space. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 83, 3–9. (a)
17.
PedersenD. M.Relations among sensation seeking and simulated and behavioral personal space. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 83, 79–88. (b)
18.
PetersD. L.BentzenW. R.Human crowding and planning for the future. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., September, 1971.
19.
PostB.HetheringtonE. M.Sex differences in the use of proximity and eye contact in judgments of affiliation in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 881–889.
20.
TolorA.Psychological distance in disturbed and normal children. Psychological Reports, 1968, 23, 695–701.
21.
TolorA.OrangeS.An attempt to measure psychological distance in advantaged and disadvantaged children. Child Development, 1969, 40, 407–420.
22.
WeinsteinL.Social schemata of emotionally disturbed boys. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1965, 70, 457–461.
