Autokinesis (the apparent motion of a pinpoint of light in total darkness) has been predictably related to a variety of personality variables and psychiatric syndromes. The present study reports a statistically significant relationship between cancer and autokinesis in two samples. The first sample (17 women, 14 men) is prospective, while the second (26 women) is retrospective. In both samples, cancer subjects reported less autokinesis than controls, a finding which fits conceptually with prior work with autokinesis and also with the observation reported by many others that cancer is preceded by or associated with a sense of helplessness or hopelessness and some degree of resignation from life. A second finding, but one which has not been replicated, is a statistically significant relationship between scores on the embedded-figures test and cancer. The possible meanings of these data are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaconC.RenneckerR.CutlerM.A psychosomatic survey of cancer of the breast. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1952, 14, 453–460.
2.
BahnsonC. B.BahnsonM. B.Cancer as an alternative to psychosis. In KissenD. M.LeShanL. L. (Eds.), Psychosomatic aspects of neoplastic disease. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1964. Pp. 184–202. (a)
3.
BahnsonC. B.BahnsonM. B.Denial and repression of primitive impulses and of disturbing emotions in patients with malignant neoplasms. In KissenD. M.LeShanL. L. (Eds.), Psychosomatic aspects of neoplastic disease. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1964. Pp. 42–62. (b)
4.
BahnsonC. B.BahnsonM. B.Role of the ego defenses: denial and repression in the etiology of malignant neoplasms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1966, 125, 827–845.
5.
BoothG.General and organic-specific object relationships in cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1969, 164, 568–577.
6.
CancroR.VotoH. M.Autokinesis and psychological differentiation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 28, 99–103.
7.
CancroR.VothH. M.VotoA. C.Character organization and the style of hospital treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1968, 19, 161–164.
8.
EngelG. L.SchmaleA. H.Jr.Psychoanalytic theory of somatic disorder: conversion, specificity and the disease onset situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1967, 15, 344–365.
9.
EvansE.A psychological study of cancer. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1926.
10.
GilbertD. C.A factor analytic study of autokinetic responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 73, 354–357.
11.
HarlowH. F.HarlowM. K.The affectional systems. In SchrierA. M.HarlowH. F.StollnitzF. (Eds.), Behavior of non-human primates. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 287–334.
12.
HendersonJ. G.Denial and repression as factors in the delay of patients with cancer presenting themselves to the physician. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1966, 125, 856–864.
13.
KissenD. M.Relationship between lung cancer, cigarette smoking, inhalation and personality. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1964, 37, 203–216.
14.
KissenD. M.EysenckH. J.Personality in male lung cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1962, 6, 123–237.
15.
KissenD. M.RaoL. G. A.Steroid excretion patterns and personality in lung cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1969, 128, 476–482.
16.
LeShanL.Loss of cathexis as a common psychodynamic characteristic of cancer patients. Psychological Reports, 1956, 2, 183–197. (a)
17.
LeShanL.Personality as a factor in the pathogenesis of cancer: a review of the literature. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1956, 29, 49–56. (b)
18.
LeShanL.Some recurrent life history patterns observed in patients with malignant disease. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1956, 124, 460–465. (c)
19.
LeShanL.A psychosomatic hypothesis concerning the etiology of Hodgkin's disease. Psychological Reports, 1957, 3, 565–575.
LeShanL.Some observations on the problem of mobilizing the patients' will to live. In KissenD. M.LeShanL. L. (Eds.), Psychosomatic aspects of neoplastic disease. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1964. Pp. 109–120.
22.
LeShanL.GassmanM.Some observations on psychotherapy with patients with neoplastic disease. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1958, 12, 723–734.
23.
LeShanL.ReznikoffM.Psychological factors apparently associated with neoplastic disease. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 439–440.
24.
LeShanL.WorthingtonR. E.Some psychological correlates of neoplastic disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychopathology, 1955, 16, 281–296.
25.
MaymanM.VothH. M.Reality closeness, phantasy, and autokinesis: a dimension of cognitive style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969, 74, 635–641.
26.
SantosJ. F.FarrowB. J.HainesJ. R.Consistency and style of autokinetic movementPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 583–586.
27.
SchmaleA. H.Jr.Relationship of separation and depression to disease: I. A report on hospitalized medical population. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1966, 28, 714–721.
28.
SchmaleA.IkerH.The psychological setting of uterine cervical cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1966, 125, 807–813.
29.
SchwartzM.ShagassC.Response to colored and conflict-inducing stimuli in a psychiatric population. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1960, 11, 245–252.
30.
SpitzR. A.The first year of life. New York: International Universities Press, 1965.
31.
TarlauM.SmalheiserI.Personality patterns in patients with malignant tumors of the breast and cervix: an exploratory study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1951, 13, 117–121.
32.
VothA. C.Individual differences in the autokinetic phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 29, 306–322.
33.
VothA. C.An experimental study of mental patients through the autokinetic phenomenon. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1947, 103, 793–805.
34.
VothA. C.VothH. M.Further experimental studies of mental patients through the autokinetic phenomenon. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 127, 91–96.
35.
VothH. M.Ego autonomy, autokinesis and recovery from psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1962, 6, 288–293.
36.
VothH. M.CancroR.EEG support for the concept ego-closeness—ego-distance: autokinesis as a function of attention development. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1972, 26, 445–448.
37.
VothH. M.CancroR.KissenM.Choice of defense. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1968, 18, 36–41.
38.
VothH. M.MaymanM.A dimension of personality organization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1963, 8, 366–380.
39.
VothH. M.MaymanM.The psychotherapy process and its relation to ego-closeness—ego-distance: Part 1. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1966, 143, 324–377.
40.
VothH. M.MaymanM.The psychotherapy process and its relation to ego-closeness—ego-distance: Part 2. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1968, 147, 308–315.
41.
VothH. M.MaymanM.CancroR.CoyneL.Autokinesis and character style: a clinical-experimental study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1968, 6, 51–65.
42.
VothH. M.SegersonJ. A.CancroR.Autokinesis and photic driving: their relationship to cortical excirability. Behavioral Neuropsychiatry, 1969, 1, 4–6.
43.
VothH. M.VothA. C.CancroR.Suicidal solution as a function of ego-closeness—ego-distance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969, 21, 536–545
44.
WheelerJ. I.Jr.CaldwellB. M.Psychological evaluation of women with cancer of the breast and of the cervix. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1955, 17, 256–268.
45.
WitkinH. A.Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 1950, 19, 1–15.
46.
WitkinH. A.Psychological differentiation and forms of pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 317–336.
