This is a report on validity testing of a novel telephone-sampling technique created as a less expensive and less time-consuming survey method. The technique also enables the sampling of both listed and unlisted telephone numbers. Validity coefficients were computed for door-to-door and telephone interview samples of the same population. Chi-square analyses showed that items of the two techniques were similar, suggesting that the telephone-sampling method is valid.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CooperS. L.Random sampling by telephone—an improved method. Journal of Marketing Research, 1964, 1, 45–48.
2.
EastlackJ. O.Jr.AssaelH.Better telephone surveys through centralized interviewing. Journal of Advertising Research, 1966, 6, 2–7.
3.
HauckM.CoxM.Locating a sample by random digit dialing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974, 38, 253–260.
4.
LeutholdD. A.ScheeleR.Patterns of bias in samples based on telephone directories. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1971, 35, 248–257.
5.
PayneS.Some advantages of telephone surveys. Journal of Marketing, 1956, 20, 278–281.
6.
RosenbloodL. K.ChapmanK.I-STAT: an interactive statistical program package. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1974, 6, 56.
7.
SudmanS.New uses of telephone directories for survey sampling. Journal of Marketing Research, 1966, 3, 163–167.
8.
SudmanS.The uses of telephone directories for survey sampling. Journal of Marketing Research, 1973, 10, 47–53.
9.
TroldahlV. C.CarterR. E.Jr.Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1964, 1, 71–76.