Comparison of Nonretarded and Mentally Retarded Children on Tasks Involving Direct and Rule-Governed Imitation

Abstract

The influence of intellectual level and social reinforcement on imitation learning was examined. Tasks involving direct and rule-governed imitation of a model were presented to 20 mentally retarded and 20 nonretarded children. The children within each group were randomly assigned to either an affective (“good-fine”) or an informative (“correct-right”) social reinforcement condition. Reinforcement, administered on a fixed ratio (FR4) schedule, was contingent on the child's imitative behavior. A multivariate analysis of variance showed that both the Population X Reinforcement Type interaction and the Reinforcement main effect were significant. Univariate follow-up tests showed that only rule-governed imitation contributed significantly to the multivariate effects. Analysis of simple effects indicated that retarded children performed optimally under affective reinforcement, while the nonretarded children performed highest under informative reinforcement.